OBJECTIVE: The light scattering intensity of normal, clear lenses varies with age and with the localization within the lens. Realizing the biometry of single lens areas together with their relevant light scattering intensity one should be able to calculate an index to express the lens transparency properties of normal human lenses in dependence on age. Performing the same procedure in cases of diabetic patients with still clear lenses it should become possible to obtain an index for the lens transparency properties of lenses under the 'risk factor' diabetes. METHODS: 748 eyes with transparent lenses in 383 healthy individuals and 134 eyes with clear lenses in 70 subjects with diabetes were examined. Scheimpflug slit images of the lens were documented by a Nidek EAS-1000 instrument. Biometry for measuring the distance of the single lens layers from the anterior capsule and densitometry for determining the light scattering intensity of six defined lens layers along the (theoretical) optical axis were performed. The index of the lens transparency properties was calculated using the light scattering intensity of a defined lens layer and its distance from the anterior capsule. RESULTS: Lens thickness and light scattering intensities increased linearly with increasing age in the normal population as well as in the diabetic patients. The densitogram pattern of the light scattering intensities in the defined representative six points was similar in both populations, but in the diabetic group the lens thickness was larger and the light scattering intensities were higher at all ages. CONCLUSION: The index of lens transparency properties calculated with the light scattering intensities of a certain lens area and its distance from the anterior capsule is a useful measure of lens clarity in dependence on age. 'Clear' lenses of the diabetic population show significantly higher indices for the lens transparency properties in all age groups.
OBJECTIVE: The light scattering intensity of normal, clear lenses varies with age and with the localization within the lens. Realizing the biometry of single lens areas together with their relevant light scattering intensity one should be able to calculate an index to express the lens transparency properties of normal human lenses in dependence on age. Performing the same procedure in cases of diabeticpatients with still clear lenses it should become possible to obtain an index for the lens transparency properties of lenses under the 'risk factor' diabetes. METHODS: 748 eyes with transparent lenses in 383 healthy individuals and 134 eyes with clear lenses in 70 subjects with diabetes were examined. Scheimpflug slit images of the lens were documented by a Nidek EAS-1000 instrument. Biometry for measuring the distance of the single lens layers from the anterior capsule and densitometry for determining the light scattering intensity of six defined lens layers along the (theoretical) optical axis were performed. The index of the lens transparency properties was calculated using the light scattering intensity of a defined lens layer and its distance from the anterior capsule. RESULTS: Lens thickness and light scattering intensities increased linearly with increasing age in the normal population as well as in the diabeticpatients. The densitogram pattern of the light scattering intensities in the defined representative six points was similar in both populations, but in the diabetic group the lens thickness was larger and the light scattering intensities were higher at all ages. CONCLUSION: The index of lens transparency properties calculated with the light scattering intensities of a certain lens area and its distance from the anterior capsule is a useful measure of lens clarity in dependence on age. 'Clear' lenses of the diabetic population show significantly higher indices for the lens transparency properties in all age groups.