Literature DB >> 9929334

The potential of the digital anatomist foundational model for assuring consistency in UMLS sources.

J L Mejino1, C Rosse.   

Abstract

Inconsistent anatomical concept representation can be identified in anatomy textbooks and hard copy term lists, as well as in UMLS source vocabularies and other controlled medical terminologies. In this report we select some examples of inconsistent representations of anatomical concepts, and illustrate how these inconsistencies can be explained and reconciled by the Digital Anatomist Foundational Model. We use this process for gaining a measure of the validity of the logic-based Model.

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9929334      PMCID： PMC2232313     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN： 1531-605X


  5 in total

1.  Towards a new terminology for clinical anatomy, with special reference to the heart.

Authors:  M A Message; R H Anderson
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  Motivation and organizational principles for anatomical knowledge representation: the digital anatomist symbolic knowledge base.

Authors:  C Rosse; J L Mejino; B R Modayur; R Jakobovits; K P Hinshaw; J F Brinkley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Evaluation of the Unified Medical Language System as a medical knowledge source.

Authors:  O Bodenreider; A Burgun; G Botti; M Fieschi; P Le Beux; F Kohler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Symbolic anatomic knowledge representation in the Read Codes version 3: structure and application.

Authors:  E B Schulz; C Price; P J Brown
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A logical foundation for representation of clinical data.

Authors:  K E Campbell; A K Das; M A Musen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497
  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Conceptualization of anatomical spatial entities in the Digital Anatomist Foundational Model.

Authors:  J L Mejino; C Rosse
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Influence of the Digital Anatomist Foundational Model on traditional representations of anatomical concepts.

Authors:  A V Agoncillo; J L Mejino; C Rosse
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

3.  Issues in the design of medical ontologies used for knowledge sharing.

Authors:  A Burgun; G Botti; M Fieschi; P Le Beux
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Integration of a standard gastrointestinal endoscopy terminology in the UMLS Metathesaurus.

Authors:  Michele Tringali; William T Hole; Suresh Srinivasan
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

Review 5.  A review of auditing techniques for the Unified Medical Language System.

Authors:  Ling Zheng; Zhe He; Duo Wei; Vipina Keloth; Jung-Wei Fan; Luke Lindemann; Xinxin Zhu; James J Cimino; Yehoshua Perl
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  The Unified Medical Language System at 30 Years and How It Is Used and Published: Systematic Review and Content Analysis.

Authors:  Xia Jing
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-08-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.