Literature DB >> 9925019

Auditory brainstem response forward-masking recovery functions in older humans with normal hearing.

J Walton1, M Orlando, R Burkard.   

Abstract

We investigated the auditory brainstem response (ABR) recovery from forward masking using toneburst maskers and probes. Two subject groups matched for hearing thresholds were evaluated: normal-hearing young adults (21-40 years) and older subjects (63-77 years) with normal audiometric thresholds. Stimuli consisted of 1, 4 and 8 kHz tonebursts, with 2-4 cycle rise/fall time and no plateau. Forward maskers were tonebursts of the same frequency, with a 5 ms rise/fall time and a 20 ms plateau time. Probes were presented at 40 dB above threshold, and the forward masker was adjusted to a level that just eliminated the ABR to the 40 dB sensation level toneburst when the probe onset occurred at masker offset. Forward-masker intervals varied from 2 to 64 ms. ABR wave V latencies were similar for the young and old age groups regardless of toneburst frequency. Under forward-masking conditions, wave V latency was prolonged for the shorter intervals, and recovered to baseline latency by 64 ms. The forward-masker recovery functions were nearly identical for the two age groups for the 1 kHz toneburst. In contrast, there were clear differences in the recovery functions for the two age groups for the 4 and 8 kHz tonebursts. Specifically, the mean latency shift was greater for the aged group for forward-masker intervals of 16 ms or less. The two age groups showed identical latency shifts for longer forward-masker intervals. These data demonstrate prolonged recovery from forward masking in older human subjects. As these subjects had audiometric thresholds within normal limits, one plausible interpretation of this finding is that the prolonged recovery time is a manifestation of an aging effect on the central auditory nervous system rather than the periphery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9925019     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00175-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  18 in total

1.  Forward Masking of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Denise C Menezes; Kevin D Brown; John H Grose
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Gap duration discrimination for frequency-asymmetric gap markers: psychophysical and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Andreu Paredes Gallardo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Developmental trends in auditory processing can provide early predictions of language acquisition in young infants.

Authors:  Weerasak Chonchaiya; Twila Tardif; Xiaoqin Mai; Lin Xu; Mingyan Li; Niko Kaciroti; Paul R Kileny; Jie Shao; Betsy Lozoff
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-12-20

5.  Prenatal exposure to multiple pesticides is associated with auditory brainstem response at 9months in a cohort study of Chinese infants.

Authors:  Julie Sturza; Monica K Silver; Lin Xu; Mingyan Li; Xiaoqin Mai; Yankai Xia; Jie Shao; Betsy Lozoff; John Meeker
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Sodium salicylate alters temporal integration measured through increasing stimulus presentation rates.

Authors:  Nicole J Wood; Andrea S Lowe; Joseph P Walton
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Electrophysiological measurement of binaural beats: effects of primary tone frequency and observer age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Identification of the Spectrotemporal Modulations That Support Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Allison-Graham Martin; Gregory Hickok; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Measures of hearing threshold and temporal processing across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Diane Kewley-Port; Daniel Fogerty; Dana Kinney
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.