Literature DB >> 9922615

Aluminium radiopacity standards for dentistry: an international survey.

D C Watts1, J F McCabe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine the appropriate composition and purity limits of aluminium alloy radiopacity standards for dental biomaterials, taking into account the current status in representative laboratories worldwide, and to formalise the calculation procedure for processing radiopacity data.
METHODS: A series of aluminium step-wedges were obtained from academic and industrial research laboratories. These were analysed by energy dispersive X-ray procedures. The set of step-wedges were independently characterised for radiopacity at two University dental schools.
RESULTS: The percentage of aluminium together with the percentages of minor alloying elements (magnesium, manganese, iron and silicon) have been determined as mass percentages. For each centre, the optical density versus step-height for all wedges was judged to fall on a common curve, with the main exception of one step-wedge that was found to contain 4% copper, by mass. A suitable calculation procedure was described explicitly.
CONCLUSION: Of the examined representative step-wedges, all but the aluminium--4% copper material were satisfactory and gave results comparable with wedges of high purity. Limits should therefore be revised for composition of aluminium radiopacity step-wedges or test blocks to a more realistic level of purity. Alloys with more than 0.05% copper or 1.0% iron should be excluded and the aluminium content should be at least 98% by mass. In the calculations deployed for deriving radiopacity as 'equivalent aluminium thicknesses', an appropriate linear regression procedure should be employed and considerable care taken in the evaluation of materials of low or borderline radiopacity, relative to specification limits. The method described is principally suitable for materials with radiopacity greater than 1 mm. For materials with radiopacity less than 1 mm aluminium, thicker specimens (2 mm) should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9922615     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00025-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  12 in total

1.  Radiopacity of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Tomaž Hitij; Aleš Fidler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  How does duration of curing affect the radiopacity of dental materials?

Authors:  Arash Poorsattar Bejeh Mir; Morvarid Poorsattar Bejeh Mir
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-06-25

3.  [Comparative study on radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials'determination using film imaging and digital imaging].

Authors:  Y Li; H Lin; T J Zhang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-10-18

4.  The influence of different radiopacifying agents on the radiopacity, compressive strength, setting time, and porosity of Portland cement.

Authors:  Djordje Antonijevic; Ivana Medigovic; Milorad Zrilic; Bojan Jokic; Zorica Vukovic; Ljubomir Todorovic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Radiopacity of restorative materials using digital images.

Authors:  Leda Maria Pescinini Salzedas; Mário Jefferson Quirino Louzada; Antonio Braz de Oliveira Filho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  In vitro comparison of the radiopacity of cavity lining materials with human dental structures.

Authors:  Fernanda Cp Pires de Souza; Luiz C Pardini; Diogo R Cruvinel; Hisham M Hamida; Lucas Fr Garcia
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-04

7.  Evaluation of radiopacities of CAD/CAM restorative materials and resin cements by digital radiography.

Authors:  Zerrin Unal Erzurumlu; Cennet Elcin Sagirkaya; Kerem Erzurumlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.606

8.  Assessment of radiopacity of restorative composite resins with various target distances and exposure times and a modified aluminum step wedge.

Authors:  Arash Poorsattar Bejeh Mir; Morvarid Poorsattar Bejeh Mir
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-09-21

9.  Premixed calcium silicate cement for endodontic applications: injectability, setting time and radiopacity.

Authors:  Cecilia Persson; Håkan Engqvist
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep

10.  Comparison of radiopacity of different composite resins.

Authors:  Pinar Gul; Fatma Çaglayan; Nilgün Akgul; Hayati Murat Akgul
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.