OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether nursing home residents and their families reported discussions about life-sustaining treatment with their physicians, the relationship between such discussions and orders to limit therapy, and predictors of physician-patient communication about life-sustaining treatment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interviews and retrospective chart abstraction. SETTING: Three regions: West Coast, New England, Western. SAMPLE: A total of 413 nursing home residents, 363 family/surrogate interviews, and 192 resident interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measured were (1) physician-resident communication about life-sustaining treatment and (2) presence of an advance directive or do not resuscitate (DNR) order in resident's chart. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of residents had DNR orders, and 32% had advance directives; only 29% of residents reported discussions about life-sustaining treatment. Of residents with DNR orders who could have participated in discussions about life-sustaining treatment, nearly half reported they had not discussed CPR with their caregivers. Older age, longer duration of time living in nursing home, location in a New England nursing home, physician-family member discussion, and the presence of an advance directive in the medical chart were positively associated with having DNR orders. Physician-resident discussion was not associated with having a DNR order. For the subsample of interviewed residents, age and a diagnosis of cognitive impairment were negatively associated with a physician-resident discussion about life-sustaining treatment, whereas the likelihood of having a discussion increased with increasing numbers of medical diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Chart orders to limit therapy are common, but physician-resident discussions about life-sustaining treatments are not. Far more family members than residents report such discussions with the resident's physicians.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether nursing home residents and their families reported discussions about life-sustaining treatment with their physicians, the relationship between such discussions and orders to limit therapy, and predictors of physician-patient communication about life-sustaining treatment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interviews and retrospective chart abstraction. SETTING: Three regions: West Coast, New England, Western. SAMPLE: A total of 413 nursing home residents, 363 family/surrogate interviews, and 192 resident interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measured were (1) physician-resident communication about life-sustaining treatment and (2) presence of an advance directive or do not resuscitate (DNR) order in resident's chart. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of residents had DNR orders, and 32% had advance directives; only 29% of residents reported discussions about life-sustaining treatment. Of residents with DNR orders who could have participated in discussions about life-sustaining treatment, nearly half reported they had not discussed CPR with their caregivers. Older age, longer duration of time living in nursing home, location in a New England nursing home, physician-family member discussion, and the presence of an advance directive in the medical chart were positively associated with having DNR orders. Physician-resident discussion was not associated with having a DNR order. For the subsample of interviewed residents, age and a diagnosis of cognitive impairment were negatively associated with a physician-resident discussion about life-sustaining treatment, whereas the likelihood of having a discussion increased with increasing numbers of medical diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Chart orders to limit therapy are common, but physician-resident discussions about life-sustaining treatments are not. Far more family members than residents report such discussions with the resident's physicians.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Authors: Timothy P Daaleman; Christianna S Williams; John S Preisser; Philip D Sloane; Holly Biola; Sheryl Zimmerman Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2009-03-28 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Adam D Schickedanz; Dean Schillinger; C Seth Landefeld; Sara J Knight; Brie A Williams; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sarah Sommer; Georg Marckmann; Michael Pentzek; Karl Wegscheider; Heinz-Harald Abholz; Jürgen in der Schmitten Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Lee A Jennings; David Zingmond; Rachel Louie; Chi-Hong Tseng; Judy Thomas; Kate O'Malley; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 5.128