Literature DB >> 9918615

Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells.

J Himpens1, G B Cadière, J Bruyns, M Vertruyen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach usually reduces the morbidity of procedures performed by laparotomy. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of laparoscopic rectopexy.
METHODS: A total of 37 patients were included in this prospective study. The indication was true rectal prolapse in all patients. Incontinence was seen in 33% of the patients. A slightly modified Wells procedure was performed laparoscopically. Postoperatively, the patients were evaluated for resolution of the prolapse and incontinence. They were also questioned about their satisfaction with the procedure.
RESULTS: Laparoscopy was successful in all but one case. Follow-up is available in 32 of 37 patients. Prolapse was cured in all patients, and the incontinence resolved in 11 of 12. In addition, 38% of the patients experienced significant constipation preoperatively versus 5% postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9918615     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

Review 1.  Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  F Cadeddu; P Sileri; M Grande; E De Luca; L Franceschilli; G Milito
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Digital assessment of lower rectum fixity in rectal prolapse (DALR): a simple clinical anatomical test to determine the most suitable approach (abdominal versus perineal) for repair.

Authors:  Deya Marzouk; Michael J Ramdass; Amyn Haji; Mansoor Akhtar
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  A Ayav; L Bresler; J Hubert; L Brunaud; P Boissel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Abdominal Approaches to Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Kyla Joubert; Jonathan A Laryea
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

5.  Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  T T Zittel; K Manncke; S Haug; J F Schäfer; M E Kreis; H D Becker; E C Jehle
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Comparison of perineal operations with abdominal operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Woramin Riansuwan; Tracy L Hull; Jane Bast; Jeff P Hammel; Jame M Church
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Alexander Rickert; Peter Kienle
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-09-10

Review 8.  Single-incision laparoscopic rectopexy (Wells) with simultaneous sigmoidectomy in a case of complete rectal prolapse and a sigmoid tumor: report of a case.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Ichiro Takemasa; Yukako Mokutani; Mamoru Uemura; Junichi Nishimura; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Clinical and functional outcome of laparoscopic posterior rectopexy (Wells) for full-thickness rectal prolapse. A prospective study.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Dulucq; Pascal Wintringer; Ahmad Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic management of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.