Literature DB >> 9918060

Some new developments in the understanding of oropharyngeal and postingestional controls of meal size.

J D Davis1.   

Abstract

This review focuses on new developments in the understanding of how oropharyngeal and postingestional stimulation control the ingestive behavior of the rat ingesting liquids. With the development of the computer-controlled lickometer it is now possible to measure and analyze in fine detail the impact these two variables have on the rat's licking behavior. Because variations in this behavior are responsible for variations in intake this methodology is beginning to provide a clearer picture of how oropharyngeal and postingestional stimulation control ingestive behavior and interact to control meal size. These developments should in turn ultimately provide the basis for better understanding of how the motor systems of the brain control the behavior that supplies the body with its nutrients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9918060     DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00109-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrition        ISSN: 0899-9007            Impact factor:   4.008


  10 in total

1.  Necessity of the glossopharyngeal nerve in the maintenance of normal intake and ingestive bout size of corn oil by rats.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Ginger D Blonde; Enshe Jiang; Dani Gonzalez; James C Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Establishing meal patterns by lickometry in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus): translational applications from the bench to the field and the clinic.

Authors:  Corinna N Ross; Michael L Power; Suzette D Tardif
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Oxytocin decreases sweet taste sensitivity in mice.

Authors:  Michael S Sinclair; Isabel Perea-Martinez; Marianne Abouyared; Steven J St John; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-30

5.  mu-Opioid receptor stimulation in the nucleus accumbens elevates fatty tastant intake by increasing palatability and suppressing satiety signals.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Katsuura; Jennifer A Heckmann; Sharif A Taha
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Ghrelin increases the motivation to eat, but does not alter food palatability.

Authors:  Joost Overduin; Dianne P Figlewicz; Jennifer Bennett-Jay; Sepideh Kittleson; David E Cummings
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  CCK-58 elicits both satiety and satiation in rats while CCK-8 elicits only satiation.

Authors:  Joost Overduin; James Gibbs; David E Cummings; Joseph R Reeve
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.750

8.  Post-oral sugar detection rapidly and chemospecifically modulates taste-guided behavior.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Sex-specific enhancement of palatability-driven feeding in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Angela T Liu; Niall P Murphy; Nigel T Maidment; Sean B Ostlund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Behavioral Evidence for More than One Taste Signaling Pathway for Sugars in Rats.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.