Literature DB >> 24468546

CCK-58 elicits both satiety and satiation in rats while CCK-8 elicits only satiation.

Joost Overduin1, James Gibbs2, David E Cummings3, Joseph R Reeve4.   

Abstract

Reduction of food intake by exogenous cholecystokinin (CCK) has been demonstrated primarily for its short molecular form, CCK-8. Mounting evidence, however, implicates CCK-58 as a major physiologically active CCK form, with different neural and exocrine response profiles than CCK-8. In three studies, we compared meal-pattern effects of intraperitoneal injections CCK-8 vs. CCK-58 in undeprived male Sprague-Dawley rats consuming sweetened condensed milk. In study 1, rats (N=10) received CCK-8, CCK-58 (0.45, 0.9, 1.8 and 3.6 nmol/kg) or vehicle before a 4-h test-food presentation. At most doses, both CCK-8 and CCK-58 similarly reduced meal size relative to vehicle. Meal-size reduction prompted a compensatory shortening of the intermeal interval (IMI) after CCK-8, but not after CCK-58, which uniquely increased the satiety ratio (IMI/size of the preceding meal). In the second study, lick patterns were monitored after administration of 0.9 nmol/kg CCK-58, CCK-8 or vehicle. Lick cluster size, lick efficiency and interlick-interval distribution remained unaltered compared to vehicle, implying natural satiation, rather than illness, following both CCK forms. In study 3, threshold satiating doses of the two CCK forms were given at 5 and 30 min after meal termination, respectively. CCK 58, but not CCK-8 increased the intermeal interval and satiety ratio compared to vehicle. In conclusion, while CCK 58 and CCK-8 both stimulate satiation, thereby reducing meal size, CCK-58 consistently exerts a satiety effect, prolonging IMI. Given the physiological prominence of CCK-58, these results suggest that CCK's role in food intake regulation may require re-examination.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCK-58; Intermeal interval; Lick microstructure; Meal pattern; Satiety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24468546      PMCID: PMC3989439          DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2014.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Peptides        ISSN: 0196-9781            Impact factor:   3.750


  65 in total

1.  Cholecystokinin-58 is more potent in inhibiting food intake than cholecystokinin-8 in rats.

Authors:  Joerg Glatzle; Helen E Raybould; Markus A Kueper; Joseph R Reeve; Tilman T Zittel
Journal:  Nutr Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.994

2.  The RAPID method for blood processing yields new insight in plasma concentrations and molecular forms of circulating gut peptides.

Authors:  Andreas Stengel; David Keire; Miriam Goebel; Lena Evilevitch; Brian Wiggins; Yvette Taché; Joseph R Reeve
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  The short term satiety peptide cholecystokinin reduces meal size and prolongs intermeal interval.

Authors:  Dalya M Lateef; Martha C Washington; Ayman I Sayegh
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Cholecystokinin-33 inhibits meal size and prolongs the subsequent intermeal interval.

Authors:  Martha C Washington; Jason Coggeshall; Ayman I Sayegh
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 5.  The control of food intake: behavioral versus molecular perspectives.

Authors:  Stephen C Woods
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 27.287

6.  Normal feeding and body weight in Fischer 344 rats lacking the cholecystokinin-1 receptor gene.

Authors:  J E Blevins; J Overduin; J M Fuller; D E Cummings; K Matsumoto; D H Moralejo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  Fatty acid oxidation in the energostatic control of eating--a new idea.

Authors:  Wolfgang Langhans
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Effects of cholecystokinin-58 on type 1 cholecystokinin receptor function and regulation.

Authors:  S Vincent Wu; Kaleeckal G Harikumar; Rebecca J Burgess; Joseph R Reeve; Laurence J Miller
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 9.  Unique activities of cholecystokinin-58; physiological and pathological relevance.

Authors:  Gary M Green; J R Reeve
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Forebrain melanocortin signaling enhances the hindbrain satiety response to CCK-8.

Authors:  James E Blevins; Gregory J Morton; Diana L Williams; David W Caldwell; Lloyd S Bastian; Brent E Wisse; Michael W Schwartz; Denis G Baskin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.619

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Role of gastrointestinal hormones in feeding behavior and obesity treatment.

Authors:  Timothy Sean Kairupan; Haruka Amitani; Kai-Chun Cheng; Joshua Runtuwene; Akihiro Asakawa; Akio Inui
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  TMEM16B determines cholecystokinin sensitivity of intestinal vagal afferents of nodose neurons.

Authors:  Runping Wang; Yongjun Lu; Michael Z Cicha; Madhu V Singh; Christopher J Benson; Christopher J Madden; Mark W Chapleau; François M Abboud
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 3.  Metabolic Actions of the Type 1 Cholecystokinin Receptor: Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Laurence J Miller; Aditya J Desai
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 12.015

4.  Cholecystokinin responsiveness varies across the population dependent on metabolic phenotype.

Authors:  Aditya J Desai; Maoqing Dong; Blake T Langlais; Amylou C Dueck; Laurence J Miller
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Hindbrain orexin 1 receptors blunt intake suppression by gastrointestinal nutrients and cholecystokinin in male rats.

Authors:  Diana L Williams; Isabel I Coiduras; Eric M Parise; Calyn B Maske
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  The physiological control of eating: signals, neurons, and networks.

Authors:  Alan G Watts; Scott E Kanoski; Graciela Sanchez-Watts; Wolfgang Langhans
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  GPR83 engages endogenous peptides from two distinct precursors to elicit differential signaling.

Authors:  Seshat M Mack; Ivone Gomes; Amanda K Fakira; Mariana L Duarte; Achla Gupta; Lloyd Fricker; Lakshmi A Devi
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.054

8.  Glutamate-dependent regulation of food intake is altered with age through changes in NMDA receptor phenotypes on vagal afferent neurons.

Authors:  Dulce M Minaya; Rachel Wanty Larson; Piotr Podlasz; Krzysztof Czaja
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-02-21

9.  Alignments of endocrine, anthropometric, and metabolic parameters in type 2 diabetes after intervention with an Okinawa-based Nordic diet.

Authors:  Bodil Ohlsson; Gassan Darwiche; Bodil Roth; Peter Höglund
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Roles of Cholecystokinin in the Nutritional Continuum. Physiology and Potential Therapeutics.

Authors:  Laurence J Miller; Kaleeckal G Harikumar; Denise Wootten; Patrick M Sexton
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.