Literature DB >> 9917667

In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis.

D A Dennis1, R D Komistek, C E Colwell, C S Ranawat, R D Scott, T S Thornhill, M A Lapp.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine in vivo femorotibial contact patterns for subjects having a posterior cruciate retaining or posterior cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty. Femorotibial contact of 72 subjects implanted with a total knee replacement, performed by five surgeons, was analyzed using video fluoroscopy. Thirty-one subjects were implanted with a posterior cruciate retaining total knee replacement with a flat polyethylene posterior lipped insert, 12 with a posterior cruciate retaining total knee replacement with a curved insert, and 29 with a posterior cruciate substituting total knee replacement. Each subject performed successive deep knee bends to maximum flexion. Video images at 0 degree, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees flexion were downloaded onto a workstation computer. Femorotibial contact paths were determined for the medial and lateral condyles using an interactive model fitting technique. Femorotibial contact anterior to the tibial midline in the sagittal plane was denoted as positive and contact posterior was denoted as negative. Analysis of average femorotibial contact pathways of both posterior cruciate retaining designs revealed posterior femorotibial contact in full extension with anterior translation of femorotibial contact commonly observed in midflexion and terminal flexion. In posterior cruciate substituting designs, anterior femoral translation was seen medially at 30 degrees to 60 degrees flexion but rarely was observed laterally. Posterior femoral rollback laterally from full extension to 90 degrees flexion was seen in 100% of subjects implanted with a posterior cruciate substituting total knee replacement, versus 51.6% (posterior lipped polyethylene insert) and 58.3% (curved insert) of those with a posterior cruciate retaining total knee replacement. Data from this multicenter study are remarkably similar to previous fluoroscopy data from a single surgeon series, showing a lack of customary posterior femoral rollback in both posterior cruciate retaining designs, and conversely showing an average anterior femoral translation with knee flexion. Posterior femoral rollback, less than in normal knees, routinely was observed in posterior cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty, attributed to engagement of the femoral component cam with the tibial post. The abnormal anterior femoral translation observed in posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty may be a factor in premature polyethylene wear observed in retrieval studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917667     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  70 in total

1.  Kinematic analysis of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prostheses by simulation.

Authors:  K Higashijima; A Ishida; Y Fukuoka; A Hoshino; H Minamitani
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The effects of implantation of tibio-femoral components in hyperextension on kinematics of TKA.

Authors:  Zhi-Wei Wang; Yu-Liang Liu; Kun-Jhih Lin; Tie-Bing Qu; Xiang Dong; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Yong Hai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Retrospective comparative study shows no significant difference in postural stability between cruciate-retaining (CR) and cruciate-substituting (PS) total knee implant systems.

Authors:  Juergen Götz; Johannes Beckmann; Ingo Sperrer; Clemens Baier; Silvia Dullien; Joachim Grifka; Franz Koeck
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Medial pivot knee in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Atzori; Wael Salama; Luigi Sabatini; Shazly Mousa; Abdelrahman Khalefa
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

5.  The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Bellemans; F Robijns; J Duerinckx; S Banks; H Vandenneucker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery.

Authors:  Seong Il Bin; Tae Seok Nam
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [In vivo biomechanics of unicondylar knee replacement performed using minimally invasive technique].

Authors:  J-N A Argenson; R D Komistek; S Akizuki
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  [TKA kinematics. In vivo techniques and results].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; T Vogl; K-H Englmeier; D A Dennis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Intraoperative evaluation of total knee replacement: kinematic assessment with a navigation system.

Authors:  Daniela Casino; Stefano Zaffagnini; Sandra Martelli; Nicola Lopomo; Simone Bignozzi; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Posterior stabilized TKA reduce patellofemoral contact pressure compared with cruciate retaining TKA in vitro.

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Thomas J Heyse; Nadine Kron; Sven Ostermeier; Christof Hurschler; Markus D Schofer; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.