Literature DB >> 17072657

Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery.

Seong Il Bin1, Tae Seok Nam.   

Abstract

We compared clinical [including maximal flexion and range of motion (ROM)] and radiographical outcomes of high-flex versus conventional implants for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after 1 year. We also analyzed the factors affecting postoperative ROM in high-flex implants. The high-flex group (n=90) had an average maximal flexion of 129.8 degrees (standard deviation (SD), 5.2 degrees ) significantly higher than the 124.3 degrees (SD, 9.2 degrees ) of the conventional group (n=90), especially for patients with less than 90 degrees of knee flexion (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital for special surgery (HSS) score between the two groups. No knee developed osteolysis, aseptic loosening, or other complications. We found that, for high-flex implants, preoperative ROM had a significant effect on postoperative ROM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17072657     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0202-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  25 in total

1.  Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI.

Authors:  S Nakagawa; Y Kadoya; S Todo; A Kobayashi; H Sakamoto; M A Freeman; Y Yamano
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-11

Review 2.  Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants.

Authors:  S J Mulholland; U P Wyss
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Knee joint functional range of movement prior to and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry.

Authors:  Christine M Myles; Philip J Rowe; Colin R C Walker; Richard W Nutton
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis.

Authors:  A Lizaur; L Marco; R Cebrian
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-07

5.  Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A Ritter; E D Campbell
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Range of motion in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Y S Anouchi; M McShane; F Kelly; J Elting; J Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion.

Authors:  James P McAuley; Michael F Harrer; Deborah Ammeen; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Kawamura; R B Bourne
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs.

Authors:  J T Chew; N J Stewart; A D Hanssen; Z P Luo; J A Rand; K N An
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hy-Flex II total knee system and range of motion.

Authors:  Junji Yamazaki; Shin Ishigami; Masakazu Nagashima; Shinichi Yoshino
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  50 in total

1.  Three- to six-year follow-up results after high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: can we allow passive deep knee bending?

Authors:  Sung-Do Cho; Yoon-Seok Youm; Ki-Bong Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Total knee replacement with ceramic femoral components: a national prospective multicenter study of clinical and radiological outcomes].

Authors:  P Bergschmidt; C Lohmann; D Ganzer; R Bader; S Finze; G Kundt; C Hauzeur; C Lukas; W Rüther; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Can a high-flexion total knee arthroplasty relieve pain and restore function without premature failure?

Authors:  Ryan D Bauman; Derek R Johnson; Travis J Menge; Raymond H Kim; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison of range of motion after standard and high-flexion posterior stabilised total knee replacement.

Authors:  F Y Ng; H L Wong; W P Yau; K Y Chiu; W M Tang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Predicting range of movement after knee replacement: the importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope.

Authors:  Ajay Malviya; E A Lingard; D J Weir; D J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Outcome after knee dislocations: a 2-9 years follow-up of 85 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg; Ben Robertson; Tom C Ludvigsen; Steinar Johansen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Do high flexion posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty designs increase knee flexion? A meta analysis.

Authors:  Takanobu Sumino; Hemanth R Gadikota; Kartik M Varadarajan; Young-Min Kwon; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  High-flexion total knee replacement: functional outcome at one year.

Authors:  Matthew S Hepinstall; Amar S Ranawat; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-01-29

9.  Design modifications may improve range of motion following posteriorly stabilized total knee replacement: a matched pair study.

Authors:  Allison Ruel; Christine Pui; Geoffrey Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-07-03

10.  The INDUS knee prosthesis - Prospective multicentric trial of a posteriorly stabilized high-flex design: 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  Kantilal H Sancheti; Nandu S Laud; Harish Bhende; Gurava Reddy; Neema Pramod; Joseph N Mani
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.