Literature DB >> 9917638

Mechanical influences on tibial fracture healing.

J Kenwright1, T Gardner.   

Abstract

Selected studies are summarized that measure interfragmentary fracture displacements in 6 degrees of freedom at intervals throughout healing in groups of patients with tibial diaphyseal fractures treated by external skeletal fixation. The results are compared with those obtained from experimental studies in which the ideal mechanical conditions for fracture healing were predicted. A finite element analysis model of the healing tibial fracture also was developed. Measured data were used for the analysis, and stress and strain patterns were defined for different stages of healing. Interfragmentary movement measured in the first 6 weeks after injury usually is a magnitude smaller in patients treated by external fixation than in patients treated with cast immobilization. This movement can be much smaller than that predicted to be optimal by experimental studies. A greater amplitude can be achieved, even in stable fractures, by ensuring patient activity. The interfragmentary movement is elastic during loading activity and is generally sinusoidal during steady walking. At the time of dynamization (the unlocking of the frame), a permanent set occurs at the fracture site in all planes. The cyclical movement range in each plane often decreases immediately after unlocking. The model analysis study of fracture healing predicts that tissue damage may occur in the later (hard callus) phase of healing, even while the fixation device is in place, because of abnormally high stresses and strains. This study indicates that fracture mechanics should be controlled more rigorously to provide amplitudes of movement in the first 4 to 6 weeks after fracture. The rigidity of fixation should be increased in the subsequent weeks until the fracture has healed and the frame is removed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917638     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Dynamization of fracture fixation : Timing and methods].

Authors:  L Claes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Regenerative rehabilitation: The role of mechanotransduction in orthopaedic regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Vaida Glatt; Christopher H Evans; Martin J Stoddart
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  The effect of different torque wrenches on rotational stiffness in compressive femoral nails: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  A A Karaarslan; N Acar
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Interfragmentary movements in the early phase of healing in distraction and correction osteotomies stabilized with ring fixators.

Authors:  Georg N Duda; Simon Sporrer; Michael Sollmann; Jan E Hoffmann; Jean-Pierre Kassi; Cyrus Khodadadyan; Michael Raschke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Differentially loaded radiostereometric analysis to monitor fracture stiffness: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Mellick J Chehade; Lucian B Solomon; Stuart A Callary; Sam H Benveniste; Anthony P Pohl; Donald W Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Therapy-resistant tibial pseudarthrosis. Treatment success with BMP-7 combined with autologous bone].

Authors:  S Siebenlist; T Kraus; R Burghardt; S Döbele; U Stöckle; A Ganslmeier
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Optical acquisition and polar decomposition of the full-field deformation gradient tensor within a fracture callus.

Authors:  Wangdo Kim; Sean S Kohles
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  New advances in musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Susan E Bove; Sarah J L Flatters; Julia J Inglis; Patrick W Mantyh
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2008-12-25

9.  Differential fracture healing resulting from fixation stiffness variability: a mouse model.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Sara M Putnam; Ambrose Wong; Philipp N Streubel; Akhilesh Kotiya; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 1.805

Review 10.  A Concert between Biology and Biomechanics: The Influence of the Mechanical Environment on Bone Healing.

Authors:  Vaida Glatt; Christopher H Evans; Kevin Tetsworth
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.