Literature DB >> 9917637

Enhancement of fracture healing by mechanical and surgical intervention.

E Y Chao1, N Inoue, J J Elias, H Aro.   

Abstract

Mechanical modulation of bone fracture repair and restoration to its structural strength must rely on the fundamental physical concept of remodeling according to the type of stress applied to immature or undifferentiated tissue. This article proposes the possible mechanisms of interaction between physical factors and cellular responses in healing long bone fractures and speculates on the advantages and limitations of different experimental models in evaluating these interactions. A revised classification system of fracture union types based on histomorphologic characteristics is introduced here as a reference standard in the studies of possible accelerating factors. Bone fracture union can follow more than one or two pathways, with various combinations of bone formation mechanisms, whereas there may be only one bone remodeling principle. There are definite mechanical and operative interventions that can provide effective enhancement to fracture healing. However, different intervention may limit its association to a specific healing mechanism. The key element in establishing these interactions is defining the precise cellular and molecular mechanisms in a quantitative manner. This can be achieved best by interdisciplinary research collaborations working on a higher level of expertise in each related field using standardized experimental models. Not only a basic understanding of the associated cellular reactions is necessary, but also the specific forms of mechanical stimulation, the dose effect, and its application timing must be determined and validated. Without this basic research effort, it would be difficult to transform such an augmentational modality into effective and reliable therapeutic regimens for clinical application. Furthermore, successful fracture repair enhancement must have proper new bone formation maintenance and remodeling through physiologic loading, or the initial stimulation process may be short lived and unable to reestablish the required biomechanical strength of the long bone. Finally, there is no substitute for a well organized and carefully controlled prospective clinical trial in establishing the validity of any bone fracture healing enhancement modality, regardless of its nature and form of application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917637     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

1.  Temporal variation in fixation stiffness affects healing by differential cartilage formation in a rat osteotomy model.

Authors:  Bettina M Willie; Robert Blakytny; Melanie Glöckelmann; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Claes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biocompatibility, bone healing, and safety evaluation in rabbits with an IlluminOss bone stabilization system.

Authors:  Amanda L McSweeney; Brett G Zani; Rose Baird; James R L Stanley; Alison Hayward; Peter M Markham; Gregory A Kopia; Elazer R Edelman; Robert Rabiner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  In vivo cyclic axial compression affects bone healing in the mouse tibia.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Timothy M Wright; Elizabeth R Myers; Mathias P Bostrom
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  [The biofeedback sole tested is a suitable device for avoiding overload under partial load].

Authors:  R Stangl; R Krug; F F Hennig; J Gusinde
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Pause insertions during cyclic in vivo loading affect bone healing.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Timothy M Wright; Mathias P Bostrom; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The effects of RANKL inhibition on fracture healing and bone strength in a mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Demetris Delos; Xu Yang; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Elizabeth R Myers; Mathias P G Bostrom; Nancy Pleshko Camacho
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Role of parathyroid hormone in the mechanosensitivity of fracture healing.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Joshua Carson; Jonathan Zelken; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Timothy M Wright; Joseph M Lane; Mathias P Bostrom
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Compressive forces induce osteogenic gene expression in calvarial osteoblasts.

Authors:  Bjoern Rath; Jin Nam; Thomas J Knobloch; John J Lannutti; Sudha Agarwal
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Knee loading accelerates bone healing in mice.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Qiwei Sun; Charles H Turner; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Joint loading modality: its application to bone formation and fracture healing.

Authors:  P Zhang; G M Malacinski; H Yokota
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.