Literature DB >> 18191137

Compressive forces induce osteogenic gene expression in calvarial osteoblasts.

Bjoern Rath1, Jin Nam, Thomas J Knobloch, John J Lannutti, Sudha Agarwal.   

Abstract

Bone cells and their precursors are sensitive to changes in their biomechanical environment. The importance of mechanical stimuli has been observed in bone homeostasis and osteogenesis, but the mechanisms responsible for osteogenic induction in response to mechanical signals are poorly understood. We hypothesized that compressive forces could exert an osteogenic effect on osteoblasts and act in a dose-dependent manner. To test our hypothesis, electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds were used as a 3-D microenvironment for osteoblast culture. The scaffolds provided a substrate allowing cell exposure to levels of externally applied compressive force. Pre-osteoblasts adhered, proliferated and differentiated in the scaffolds and showed extensive matrix synthesis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and increased Young's modulus (136.45+/-9.15 kPa) compared with acellular scaffolds (24.55+/-8.5 kPa). Exposure of cells to 10% compressive strain (11.81+/-0.42 kPa) resulted in a rapid induction of bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2), runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), and MAD homolog 5 (Smad5). These effects further enhanced the expression of genes and proteins required for extracellular matrix (ECM) production, such as alkaline phosphatase (Akp2), collagen type I (Col1a1), osteocalcin/bone gamma carboxyglutamate protein (OC/Bglap), osteonectin/secreted acidic cysteine-rich glycoprotein (ON/Sparc) and osteopontin/secreted phosphoprotein 1 (OPN/Spp1). Exposure of cell-scaffold constructs to 20% compressive strain (30.96+/-2.82 kPa) demonstrated that these signals are not osteogenic. These findings provide the molecular basis for the experimental and clinical observations that appropriate physical activities or microscale compressive loading can enhance fracture healing due in part to the anabolic osteogenic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18191137      PMCID: PMC2291547          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  50 in total

Review 1.  The response of bone to unloading.

Authors:  D D Bikle; B P Halloran
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones.

Authors:  C Rubin; A S Turner; S Bain; C Mallinckrodt; K McLeod
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The bone-specific transcriptional regulator Cbfa1 is a target of mechanical signals in osteoblastic cells.

Authors:  Panos G Ziros; Andrea-Paola Rojas Gil; Tassos Georgakopoulos; Ioannis Habeos; Dimitris Kletsas; Efthimia K Basdra; Athanasios G Papavassiliou
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Mechanical strain and bone cell function: a review.

Authors:  P J Ehrlich; Lance E Lanyon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Adhesion, growth, and matrix production by osteoblasts on collagen substrata.

Authors:  L Masi; A Franchi; M Santucci; D Danielli; L Arganini; V Giannone; L Formigli; S Benvenuti; A Tanini; F Beghè
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Effect of strain on bone nodule formation by rat osteogenic cells in vitro.

Authors:  L A Visconti; E H K Yen; R B Johnson
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for treatment of open tibial fractures: a prospective, controlled, randomized study of four hundred and fifty patients.

Authors:  Shunmugam Govender; Cristina Csimma; Harry K Genant; Alexandre Valentin-Opran; Yehuda Amit; Ron Arbel; Hannu Aro; Dan Atar; Michael Bishay; Martin G Börner; Philippe Chiron; Peter Choong; John Cinats; Brett Courtenay; Robert Feibel; Bernard Geulette; Charles Gravel; Norbert Haas; M Raschke; Eric Hammacher; D van der Velde; Philippe Hardy; Michael Holt; Christof Josten; Rupert Ludwig Ketterl; Bennie Lindeque; Günter Lob; Henry Mathevon; Gerald McCoy; D Marsh; Russell Miller; Everard Munting; Stein Oevre; L Nordsletten; Amratlal Patel; Anthony Pohl; William Rennie; Peter Reynders; Pol Maria Rommens; Jean Rondia; Willem C Rossouw; P J Daneel; Stephen Ruff; Axel Rüter; Seppo Santavirta; Thomas A Schildhauer; C Gekle; Reinhard Schnettler; David Segal; Hanns Seiler; Robert B Snowdowne; Jouwert Stapert; Gilbert Taglang; Rene Verdonk; Lucas Vogels; Arnulf Weckbach; Andreas Wentzensen; Tadeusz Wisniewski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption in fetal mouse calvaria as a result of intermittent compressive force in vitro.

Authors:  J Klein-Nulend; J P Veldhuijzen; M de Jong; E H Burger
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1987-09

10.  Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures.

Authors:  J Kenwright; A E Goodship
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  52 in total

1.  Biomechanical forces exert anabolic effects on osteoblasts by activation of SMAD 1/5/8 through type 1 BMP receptor.

Authors:  B Rath; J Nam; J Deschner; J Schaumburger; M Tingart; S Grässel; J Grifka; S Agarwal
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Mechanical stretch inhibits adipogenesis and stimulates osteogenesis of adipose stem cells.

Authors:  X Yang; X Cai; J Wang; H Tang; Q Yuan; P Gong; Y Lin
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 3.  Osteogenesis of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Brian E Grottkau; Yunfeng Lin
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 4.  Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatments and Available Formulations.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Robert A Burnett; Joshua Wright-Chisem; Rachel M Frank; Jorge Chahla
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

5.  Alternative splicing in bone following mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sara M Mantila Roosa; Yunlong Liu; Charles H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Improved cellular infiltration in electrospun fiber via engineered porosity.

Authors:  Jin Nam; Yan Huang; Sudha Agarwal; John Lannutti
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-09

7.  Media-based effects on the hydrolytic degradation and crystallization of electrospun synthetic-biologic blends.

Authors:  M Tyler Nelson; Jed Johnson; John Lannutti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Follistatin-like 3 is a mediator of exercise-driven bone formation and strengthening.

Authors:  J Nam; P Perera; R Gordon; Y H Jeong; A D Blazek; D G Kim; B C Tee; Z Sun; T D Eubank; Y Zhao; B Lablebecioglu; S Liu; A Litsky; N L Weisleder; B S Lee; T Butterfield; A L Schneyer; S Agarwal
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Fabrication of sulphonated poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate hydrogel as a bone grafting scaffold.

Authors:  Hao Li; Tingting Ma; Man Zhang; Jiani Zhu; Jie Liu; Fei Tan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Interconnectable Dynamic Compression Bioreactors for Combinatorial Screening of Cell Mechanobiology in Three Dimensions.

Authors:  Jungmok Seo; Jung-Youn Shin; Jeroen Leijten; Oju Jeon; Ayça Bal Öztürk; Jeroen Rouwkema; Yuancheng Li; Su Ryon Shin; Hadi Hajiali; Eben Alsberg; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 9.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.