Literature DB >> 9917590

Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation.

R G Middleton1, D W Howie, K Costi, P Sharpe.   

Abstract

The effects of matte finish and modularity on loosening of tapered stems using the same cementing technique were studied prospectively. In 80 patients, 82 cemented Exeter primary stems were implanted at total hip revision by one surgeon using the same surgical and cementing technique throughout the series. The polished stems behaved differently than the matte surfaced stems behaved. Polished stems subsided in the cement mantle an average of 1 mm at 2 years after implantation, but without subsequent loosening of stems at as long as 12 years after implantation. Matte surfaced stems with metal centralizers had a higher loosening rate, and loss of fixation at the prosthesis to cement interface was identified as an early sign of loosening of these stems. At a mean 6-year followup, there were no revisions nor was there radiographic evidence of loosening of the polished modular stems. It is concluded that matte finish results in increased loosening of tapered stems but the introduction of modularity did not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917590     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Assessment of wear on the cones of modular stainless steel Exeter hip stems.

Authors:  R P S Chaplin; A J C Lee; R M Hooper
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  [The cemented MS-30 stem. A multi-surgeon series of 333 consecutive cases].

Authors:  M Clauss; T Reitzel; M Pritsch; U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; V Ewerbeck; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Using 'subcement' to simulate the long-term fatigue response of cemented femoral stems in a cadaver model: could a novel preclinical screening test have caught the Exeter matt problem?

Authors:  A Race; M A Miller; K A Mann
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  CORR Insights®: systemic review of literature of cemented femoral components: what is the durability at minimum 20 years followup?

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Early Subsidence Predicts Failure of a Cemented Femoral Stem With Minor Design Changes.

Authors:  Per-Erik Johanson; Martin Antonsson; Bita Shareghi; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Total hip arthroplasty with the MS-30 polished surface cemented stem: a single surgeon consecutive series study at 10 year follow-up.

Authors:  Gavin H O Brigstocke; Philip A Mitchell; John W Rosson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-11-21

7.  High incidence of migration with poor initial fixation of the Accolade stem.

Authors:  Craig A White; Sasha Carsen; Kevin Rasuli; Robert J Feibel; Paul R Kim; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Initial evaluation on subsidence of cemented collarless polished tapered stem applied to the patients with narrow femoral medullar canal.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Dairaku; Masaji Ishii; Shinji Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Kawaji; Kan Sasaki; Yuya Takakubo; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-03-16

9.  Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems.

Authors:  Truike M Thien; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  A biomechanical assessment of modular and monoblock revision hip implants using FE analysis and strain gage measurements.

Authors:  Habiba Bougherara; Rad Zdero; Suraj Shah; Milan Miric; Marcello Papini; Paul Zalzal; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.