Literature DB >> 9893788

Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection.

Y Bonneh1, D Sagi.   

Abstract

We studied spatial integration at low contrasts by testing the detection thresholds of multi-Gabor element displays, examining configuration parameters such as orientation uniformity, contour smoothness, continuity, spacing and relative phase. We find that detectability depends on stimulus geometry and is constrained by collinearity and proximity spatial relationships. For textures, thresholds decrease with local orientation uniformity. For a 'coherent' contour (e.g. smooth and continuous), thresholds decrease linearly with increased number of elements, on a log-log scale, with a slope of -1/4 (sensitivity S proportional to N1/4). However, for a 'non-coherent' contour (e.g. jagged or with spacing > 5 lambda) thresholds are only slightly affected by the number of patches. Similar behavior is observed for supra-threshold stimuli embedded in band-pass noise. These results suggest that contrast integration is primarily based on local mechanisms and constrained by contour properties. These local mechanisms are possibly mediated by lateral interactions in the primary visual cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9893788     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00045-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning.

Authors:  Uri Polat; Tova Ma-Naim; Michael Belkin; Dov Sagi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations.

Authors:  Lynn A Olzak; Pentti I Laurinen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Global contour processing in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu; Shu-Guang Kuai; Elizabeth Rislove
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?

Authors:  Anke Huckauf; Andre Knops; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Klaus Willmes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

5.  Sensitivity and configuration-specificity of orientation-defined texture processing in infants and adults.

Authors:  Francesca Pei; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  An exploration of the spatial scale over which orientation-dependent surround effects affect contour detection.

Authors:  Jennifer F Schumacher; Christina F Quinn; Cheryl A Olman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Spatio-temporal low-level neural networks account for visual masking.

Authors:  Uri Polat; Anna Sterkin; Oren Yehezkel
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

8.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Abnormal contextual modulation of visual contour detection in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Michael-Paul Schallmo; Scott R Sponheim; Cheryl A Olman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Collinear stimuli induce local and cross-areal coherence in the visual cortex of behaving monkeys.

Authors:  Ariel Gilad; Elhanan Meirovithz; Amir Leshem; Amos Arieli; Hamutal Slovin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.