Literature DB >> 9886498

Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice?

M Tsirigotis1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9886498     DOI： 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN： 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  The clinical need for a method of identification of embryos destined to become a blastocyst in assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Susan Willman; Philip Chenette; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Propensity score-matched study and meta-analysis of cumulative outcomes of day 2/3 versus day 5/6 embryo transfers.

Authors:  Ye Yin; Ge Chen; Kezhen Li; Qiuyue Liao; Sijia Zhang; Nieying Ma; Jing Chen; Yan Zhang; Jihui Ai
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar; Cristian Roberto Alvarez Sedo; Agustín Ciapponi; Simone Cornelisse; Deborah Blake
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  Top quality embryos at day 2: a prerequisite for single blastocyst transfer? An observational cohort study in women under 36.

Authors:  Fabrice Guerif; Malak Lemseffer; Milène Blanchard; Dominique Royere
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The importance of the cleavage stage morphology evaluation for blastocyst transfer in patients with good prognosis.

Authors:  Daniela P A F Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita C S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Elective single embryo transfer: Comparison of blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kawamura; Michiko Mori; Akane Arichi; Yuko Tajima; Yasuhiro Karasawa; Kahori Suga; Sachiko Ikumi; Seika Ishikawa; Makiko Kawamura
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2005-07-28

7.  Comparison of elective single cleavage-embryo transfer to elective single blastocyst-embryo transfer in human IVF-ET.

Authors:  Sang Min Kang; Sang Won Lee; Hak Jun Jeong; San Hyun Yoon; Jin Ho Lim; Seong Goo Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2011-03-31

8.  Developmental stage on day-5 and fragmentation rate on day-3 can influence the implantation potential of top-quality blastocysts in IVF cycles with single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Tiziana della Ragione; Greta Verheyen; Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Lisbet Van Landuyt; Paul Devroey; Andre Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  ING2 (inhibitor of growth protein-2) plays a crucial role in preimplantation development.

Authors:  Lin Zhou; Pei Wang; Juanjuan Zhang; Boon Chin Heng; Guo Qing Tong
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 1.442

Review 10.  Blastocyst transfer ameliorates live birth rate compared with cleavage-stage embryos transfer in fresh in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: reviews and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Wang; Hai-Xiang Sun
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.759
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.