Literature DB >> 9880426

Factors influencing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of 221 resections.

T C Böttger1, T Junginger.   

Abstract

A critical analysis of morbidity and mortality for pancreatico-duodenectomy was performed on 221 patients. During the 1960s and 1970s, the morbidity and mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy were so high that many thought the operative procedure ought to be abandoned. During the 1980s, however, many centers reported mortality rates around 5% and a morbidity of 25% to 35%. Others still reported a mortality of more than 10% and a morbidity of up to 65%. The reasons for these discrepancies are of major interest. In a prospective case-control study 760 patients with malignant and benign diseases of the pancreas were treated in our hospital between September 1, 1985 and April 30, 1997. In 221 cases (128 men, 93 women; mean age 61 years, range 23-83 years) a partial (n = 209) or total (n = 12) pancreaticoduodenectomy, in 12 cases combined with portal vein resection, was performed. Surgical complications were seen in 25%, but less than half of them were severe. General complications were seen in 18.5%. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 3.1%, and 5.7%, respectively. In a regression analysis the intraoperative blood loss, preoperative serum bilirubin, diameter of the pancreatic duct, and occurrence of surgical and nonsurgical complications had an independent influence on mortality. In addition to the experience of the surgeon in selecting the patients and his or her personal technical skills when performing a pancreaticoduodenectomy, better anticipation and management of postoperative complications is essential for improving the results of this operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9880426     DOI: 10.1007/pl00013170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  66 in total

1.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Authors:  Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Deborah McGrath; Jennifer A Wargo; Cristina R Ferrone; Sarah P Thayer; Keith D Lillemoe; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Preventing Delayed Gastric Emptying After Whipple's Procedure-Isolated Roux Loop Reconstruction With Pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Asuri Krishna; Virinder Kumar Bansal; Subodh Kumar; P Sridhar; Sameer Kapoor; Mahesh C Misra; Pramod Garg
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Incidence and management of biliary leakage after hepaticojejunostomy.

Authors:  Steve M M de Castro; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Olivier R C Busch; Otto M van Delden; Johan S Laméris; Thomas M van Gulik; Hugo Obertop; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Portal flow into the liver through veins at the site of biliary-enteric anastomosis.

Authors:  M Hashimoto; J Heianna; K Yasuda; E Tate; J Watarai; S Shibata; T Sato; Y Yamamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Can pancreaticoduodenectomy be used to palliate selective metastatic malignancies? Case report of malignant fibrous histiocytoma.

Authors:  Mindy M Ho; Thomas J Howard; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Lessons learned from 300 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies over a 25-year experience: the "safety net" improves the outcomes beyond surgeon skills.

Authors:  Roberto Santoro; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Pasquale Lepiane; Giovanni Vennarecci; Gianluca Mascianà; Marco Colasanti; Eugenio Santoro; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience).

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Tarek Salah; Ahmad Sultan; Mohamed El Hemaly; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Emad Hamdy; Ehab Atef; Ehab El Hanafy; Ahmed El-Geidie; Mohamed Abdel Wahab; Talaat Abdallah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?--an analysis in 244 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Motoki Miyazawa; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The role of local excision in invasive adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  Jim Zhong; Manisha Palta; Christopher G Willett; Shannon J McCall; Anuradha Bulusu; Douglas S Tyler; Rebekah R White; Hope E Uronis; Theodore N Pappas; Brian G Czito
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.