Literature DB >> 9879304

Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress.

S M Shortell1, C L Bennett, G R Byck.   

Abstract

The literature on continuous quality improvement (CQI) has produced some evidence, based on nonrandomized studies, that its clinical application can improve outcomes of care while reducing costs. Its effectiveness is enhanced by a nucleus of physician involvement, individual practitioner feedback, and a supportive organizational culture. The few randomized studies, however, suggest no impact of CQI on clinical outcomes and no evidence to date of organization-wide improvement in clinical performance. Further, most studies address misuse issues and avoid examining overuse or underuse of services. The clinical application of CQI is more likely to have a pervasive impact when it takes place within a supportive regulatory and competitive environment, when it is aligned with financial incentives, and when it is under the direction of an organizational leadership that is committed to integrating all aspects of the work.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9879304      PMCID: PMC2751103          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  125 in total

1.  Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care.

Authors:  S A Buetow; M Roland
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit.

Authors:  G Johnston; I K Crombie; H T Davies; E M Alder; A Millard
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-03

3.  Designing trials of interventions to change professional practice in primary care: lessons from an exploratory study of two change strategies.

Authors:  S Rogers; C Humphrey; I Nazareth; S Lister; Z Tomlin; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

4.  Two kinds of knowledge to achieve better care.

Authors:  L A Headrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Can continuous quality improvement be assessed using randomized trials? [see comment].

Authors:  G Samsa; D Matchar
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Continuous quality improvement and controlled trials are not mutually exclusive.

Authors:  H I Goldberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Using research to inform quality programmes.

Authors:  John Ovretveit; David Gustafson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-05

8.  Evaluation of quality improvement programmes.

Authors:  J Øvretveit; D Gustafson
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

9.  Progress of unit based quality improvement: an evaluation of a support strategy.

Authors:  L Wallin; A-M Boström; G Harvey; K Wikblad; U Ewald
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

10.  Understanding team-based quality improvement for depression in primary care.

Authors:  Lisa V Rubenstein; Louise E Parker; Lisa S Meredith; Andrea Altschuler; Emmeline dePillis; John Hernandez; Nancy P Gordon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.