Literature DB >> 12468689

Progress of unit based quality improvement: an evaluation of a support strategy.

L Wallin1, A-M Boström, G Harvey, K Wikblad, U Ewald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a strategy for supporting nurses to work with quality improvement (QI).
DESIGN: Post-intervention evaluation. Study participants and intervention: 240 nurses participated in a uniformly designed 4 day basic training course in applying a model for QI. Of these, 156 nurses from over 50 healthcare institutions constituted the generic education (GE) group while 84 nurses from 42 neonatal units took part in a project to develop national guidelines, constituting the targeted intervention (TI) group.
METHOD: Postal questionnaire 4 years after the training courses.
RESULTS: The response rate was 80% in the TI group and 64% in the GE group. Nurses in the TI group had a significantly higher rate in completing all phases of the QI cycle (p=0.0002). With no differences between the groups, 39% of all nurses were still involved in QI work 4 years after the training courses. Three factors were significantly related to nurses continuing their involvement in QI projects: remaining employed on the same unit (OR 11.3), taking courses in nursing science (OR 4.1), and maintenance of the same QI model (OR 3.1). Reported motives for remaining active in QI work were the enhancement of knowledge, influence over clinical practice, and development as a nurse. Reasons for discontinuation were organisational restructuring, a lack of facilitation and knowledge, and change of workplace.
CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a national guideline project, including a common focus for improvement, facilitation and opportunities for networking, seems to have enhanced the ability to carry out the process of QI, but not to sustain the QI work over a longer period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12468689      PMCID: PMC1758020          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  29 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit.

Authors:  G Johnston; I K Crombie; H T Davies; E M Alder; A Millard
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-03

2.  Obstacles to collaborative quality improvement: the case of ambulatory general medical care.

Authors:  T K Gandhi; A L Puopolo; P Dasse; J S Haas; H R Burstin; E F Cook; T A Brennan
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Assessing the impact of total quality management and organizational culture on multiple outcomes of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.

Authors:  S M Shortell; R H Jones; A W Rademaker; R R Gillies; D S Dranove; E F Hughes; P P Budetti; K S Reynolds; C F Huang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Audit activity and quality of completed audit projects in primary care in Staffordshire.

Authors:  R Chambers; S Bowyer; I Campbell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-09

5.  Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K B Wells; C Sherbourne; M Schoenbaum; N Duan; L Meredith; J Unützer; J Miranda; M F Carney; L V Rubenstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Impact of hospital and community provider based clinical audit programmes: perceptions of doctors, nurses and other health professionals.

Authors:  J Lord; P LittleJohns
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 7.  The effectiveness of quality assurance.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Diffusion of a quality improvement programme among allied health professionals.

Authors:  E M Sluijs; J Dekker
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.038

9.  A pilot study of the introduction of audit into nursing homes.

Authors:  R Chambers; F Knight; I Campbell
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.668

10.  Does QI work? The Management to Improve Survival in Congestive Heart Failure (MISCHF) study.

Authors:  E F Philbin; L J Lynch; T A Rocco; N W Lindenmuth; K Ulrich; M McCall; P Jenkins; J B Roerden
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1996-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  An organizational perspective on the long-term sustainability of a nursing best practice guidelines program: a case study.

Authors:  Andrea R Fleiszer; Sonia E Semenic; Judith A Ritchie; Marie-Claire Richer; Jean-Louis Denis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.