Literature DB >> 9876364

A systematic review of the use of computers in the management of hypertension.

A A Montgomery1, T Fahey.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of computers and computer-based clinical decision support systems on the management of hypertension.
DESIGN: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
SETTING: Ambulatory hypertension clinics, community-based health centres, and general practices. PARTICIPANTS: 11,962 patients enrolled in seven trials retrieved from a systematic search (electronic databases, contact with authors, reference lists; no restriction on language). MAIN
RESULTS: Individual trials report on a diverse population of patients (newly diagnosed or established hypertensive patients), interventions (computers used for case finding, recall and registration, feedback on quality of blood pressure control and prescribing information), and outcomes (administration, physician performance and blood pressure control). Four of five trials reported an improvement in patient administration using a computer. Two of three trials reported an improvement in physician performance using a computer. Two of six trials. reported an improvement in blood pressure control in patients using a computer. However, positive findings in two trials should be regarded cautiously because of the potential effects of cluster randomisation.
CONCLUSIONS: It seems that computers have a favourable effect on the uptake and follow up of patients in hypertension management. The effect of computers on physician knowledge, recording of information, and blood pressure control in patients is less conclusive and further studies are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9876364      PMCID: PMC1756753          DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.8.520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  27 in total

1.  A prospective controlled trial of computerized decision support for lipid management in primary care.

Authors:  F D Hobbs; B C Delaney; A Carson; J E Kenkre
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  A randomized trial of computerized reminders for blood pressure screening in primary care.

Authors:  I McDowell; C Newell; W Rosser
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports.

Authors:  F Sullivan; E Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-30

4.  Treatment of hypertension by computer and physician-a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  F L Coe; E Norton; S Oparil; A Tatar; T N Pullman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1977-02

Review 5.  Application of computers in diabetes care--a review. II. Computers for decision support and education.

Authors:  E D Lehmann; T Deutsch
Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)       Date:  1995 Oct-Dec

6.  Randomised controlled trial of computer-held medical records in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; L J Beilin; E C Coles; C T Dollery; B F Johnson; A D Munro-Faure; S C Turner
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-03-20

Review 7.  'Evidence-based', 'cost-effective' and 'preference-driven' medicine: decision analysis based medical decision making is the pre-requisite.

Authors:  J Dowie
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1996-04

8.  A prototype computer decision support system for the management of asthma.

Authors:  T Austin; S Iliffe; M Leaning; M Modell
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Case-control study of stroke and the quality of hypertension control in north west England.

Authors:  X Du; K Cruickshank; R McNamee; M Saraee; J Sourbutts; A Summers; N Roberts; E Walton; S Holmes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-25

10.  Evaluation of computerized decision support for oral anticoagulation management based in primary care.

Authors:  D A Fitzmaurice; F D Hobbs; E T Murray; C P Bradley; R Holder
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.386

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Lyndal Trevena; Heather M Davey; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

Review 3.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies.

Authors:  Francis Lau; Craig Kuziemsky; Morgan Price; Jesse Gardner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medical record based clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Todd P Gilmer; Patrick J O'Connor; JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen; William A Rush; Paul E Johnson; Gerald H Amundson; Stephen E Asche; Heidi L Ekstrom
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings.

Authors:  Monique W M Jaspers; Marian Smeulers; Hester Vermeulen; Linda W Peute
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Clinical Decision Support Systems and Prevention: A Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gibril J Njie; Krista K Proia; Anilkrishna B Thota; Ramona K C Finnie; David P Hopkins; Starr M Banks; David B Callahan; Nicolaas P Pronk; Kimberly J Rask; Daniel T Lackland; Thomas E Kottke
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A A Montgomery; T Fahey; T J Peters; C MacIntosh; D J Sharp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

Review 8.  Hypertension and medical informatics.

Authors:  William McBride; Carlos Ferrario; Paulette A Lyle
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Effectiveness of a measurement feedback system on outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  J Fransen; G Stucki; J Twisk; A-M Chamot; J-C Gerster; T Langenegger; M Seitz; B A Michel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Influence of guideline adherence on outcome in a randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of methotrexate with folate supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J Fransen; R F J M Laan; M A F J Van Der Laar; T W J Huizinga; P L C M Van Riel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.