Literature DB >> 9875194

Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis.

G Argenziano1, G Fabbrocini, P Carli, V De Giorgi, E Sammarco, M Delfino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability of a new 7-point checklist based on simplified epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) pattern analysis with the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and standard pattern analysis for the diagnosis of clinically doubtful melanocytic skin lesions.
DESIGN: In a blind study, ELM images of 342 histologically proven melanocytic skin lesions were evaluated for the presence of 7 standard criteria that we called the "ELM 7-point checklist." For each lesion, "overall" and "ABCD scored" diagnoses were recorded. From a training set of 57 melanomas and 139 atypical nonmelanomas, odds ratios were calculated to create a simple diagnostic model based on identification of major and minor criteria for the "7-point scored" diagnosis. A test set of 60 melanomas and 86 atypical nonmelanomas was used for model validation and was then presented to 2 less experienced ELM observers, who recorded the ABCD and 7-point scored diagnoses. SETTINGS: University medical centers. PATIENTS: A sample of patients with excised melanocytic lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the models for diagnosing melanoma.
RESULTS: From the total combined sets, the 7-point checklist gave a sensitivity of 95% and a sepcificity of 75% compared with 85% sensitivity and 66% specificity using the ABCD rule and 91% sensitivity and 90% specificity using standard pattern analysis (overall ELM diagnosis). Compared with the ABCD rule, the 7-point method allowed less experienced observers to obtain higher diagnostic accuracy values.
CONCLUSIONS: The ELM 7-point checklist provides a simplification of standard pattern analysis because of the low number of features to identify and the scoring diagnostic system. As with the ABCD rule, it can be easily learned and easily applied and has proven to be reliable in diagnosing melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9875194     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.134.12.1563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  93 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostic dermoscopic algorithms].

Authors:  A Blum
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  A relative color approach to color discrimination for malignant melanoma detection in dermoscopy images.

Authors:  R Joe Stanley; William V Stoecker; Randy H Moss
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 3.  Strategies for early melanoma detection: Approaches to the patient with nevi.

Authors:  Agnessa Gadeliya Goodson; Douglas Grossman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Automatic detection of blue-white veil and related structures in dermoscopy images.

Authors:  M Emre Celebi; Hitoshi Iyatomi; William V Stoecker; Randy H Moss; Harold S Rabinovitz; Giuseppe Argenziano; H Peter Soyer
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy ("two-step method of digital follow-up") in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma.

Authors:  Gabriel Salerni; Cristina Carrera; Louise Lovatto; Joan Anton Puig-Butille; Celia Badenas; Estel Plana; Susana Puig; Josep Malvehy
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  [Multiple dark nodules on the trunk].

Authors:  E Arzberger; R Hofmann-Wellenhof
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.751

7.  Melanoma Is Skin Deep: A 3D Reconstruction Technique for Computerized Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Classification.

Authors:  T Y Satheesha; D Satyanarayana; M N Giri Prasad; Kashyap D Dhruve
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.316

8.  Dermoscopic features of cutaneous melanoma are associated with clinical characteristics of patients and tumours and with MC1R genotype.

Authors:  M C Fargnoli; F Sera; M Suppa; D Piccolo; M T Landi; A Chiarugi; C Pellegrini; S Seidenari; K Peris
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 9.  Discriminating Nevi from Melanomas: Clues and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Cristina Carrera; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 10.  [Strategies for the noninvasive diagnosis of melanoma].

Authors:  C Fink; H A Haenssle
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.