Literature DB >> 21683472

Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy ("two-step method of digital follow-up") in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma.

Gabriel Salerni1, Cristina Carrera, Louise Lovatto, Joan Anton Puig-Butille, Celia Badenas, Estel Plana, Susana Puig, Josep Malvehy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early detection of melanoma is the best way to improve prognosis. Digital follow-up (DFU) programs of populations at high risk could be an efficient strategy for detecting early melanomas with low morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to report the added value of the use of the "two-step method" (digital total body photography and digital dermatoscopy).
METHODS: This was an analysis of the surveillance of 618 patients at high risk for melanoma included in our DFU program from 1999 to 2008.
RESULTS: A total of 11,396 lesions were monitored (mean 18.44/patient) during a median follow-up of 96 months (median 10 visits/patient). A total of 1152 lesions, 1.86 per patient, were excised. Almost 70% (798) were lesions previously registered at least twice, whereas 356 (30%) were detected and removed in the same visit. During follow-up, 98 melanomas (8.5% of excised lesions) were diagnosed in 78 patients (12.6%). In all, 53 melanomas were in situ (53.3%), whereas invasive (45) showed a Breslow index of less than 1 mm (median 0.5 mm) and none were ulcerated. LIMITATIONS: Because there are no control groups we cannot determine if the combined use of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy is more beneficial than these techniques used separately.
CONCLUSION: DFU with total body photography and dermatoscopy in a selected population at high risk demonstrated the early detection of melanomas with a low rate of excisions. Long-term follow-up is required to allow the detection of slow-growing melanomas. Based on our 10-year experience, melanomas can be diagnosed at any time, suggesting that in a population at high risk for melanoma, DFU should be maintained over time.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21683472      PMCID: PMC3215791          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  31 in total

Review 1.  Total body skin imaging as an aid to melanoma detection.

Authors:  Allan C Halpern
Journal:  Semin Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2003-03

2.  Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination.

Authors:  M Berwick; C B Begg; J A Fine; G C Roush; R L Barnhill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Surveillance of patients at high risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma using digital dermoscopy.

Authors:  J Bauer; A Blum; U Strohhäcker; C Garbe
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Role of the CDKN2A locus in patients with multiple primary melanomas.

Authors:  Susana Puig; Josep Malvehy; Cèlia Badenas; Anna Ruiz; Dolores Jimenez; Francisco Cuellar; Antoni Azon; Urbá Gonzàlez; Teresa Castel; Antoni Campoy; Josep Herrero; Rosa Martí; Joan Brunet-Vidal; Montserrat Milà
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Incidence of new and changed nevi and melanomas detected using baseline images and dermoscopy in patients at high risk for melanoma.

Authors:  Jeremy P Banky; John W Kelly; Dallas R English; Josephine M Yeatman; John P Dowling
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2005-08

6.  Digital epiluminescence microscopy monitoring of high-risk patients.

Authors:  June K Robinson; Brian J Nickoloff
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2004-01

7.  Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis.

Authors:  G Argenziano; G Fabbrocini; P Carli; V De Giorgi; E Sammarco; M Delfino
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1998-12

Review 8.  Long-term dermoscopic follow-up of melanocytic naevi: clinical outcome and patient compliance.

Authors:  R Schiffner; J Schiffner-Rohe; M Landthaler; W Stolz
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. I. Pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions.

Authors:  H Pehamberger; A Steiner; K Wolff
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Importance of complete cutaneous examination for the detection of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  D S Rigel; R J Friedman; A W Kopf; R Weltman; P G Prioleau; B Safai; M G Lebwohl; Y Eliezri; D P Torre; R T Binford
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.527

View more
  35 in total

1.  Design of an Algorithm for Automated, Computer-Guided PASI Measurements by Digital Image Analysis.

Authors:  Christine Fink; Tobias Fuchs; Alexander Enk; Holger A Haenssle
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the number needed to treat melanoma in doubtful lesions.

Authors:  I Alarcon; C Carrera; J Palou; L Alos; J Malvehy; S Puig
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 3.  Update in genetic susceptibility in melanoma.

Authors:  Miriam Potrony; Celia Badenas; Paula Aguilera; Joan Anton Puig-Butille; Cristina Carrera; Josep Malvehy; Susana Puig
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

4.  The ethics of clinical photography and social media.

Authors:  César Palacios-González
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02

Review 5.  Dysplastic nevi and melanoma.

Authors:  Alisa M Goldstein; Margaret A Tucker
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Optical configuration of pigmented lesion detection by frequency analysis of skin speckle patterns.

Authors:  Yael Bishitz; Nisan Ozana; Ariel Schwarz; Yevgeny Beiderman; Javier Garcia; Zeev Zalevsky
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  Hereditary melanoma: Update on syndromes and management: Genetics of familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome.

Authors:  Efthymia Soura; Philip J Eliades; Kristen Shannon; Alexander J Stratigos; Hensin Tsao
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 8.  Discriminating Nevi from Melanomas: Clues and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Cristina Carrera; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 9.  [Strategies for the noninvasive diagnosis of melanoma].

Authors:  C Fink; H A Haenssle
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.751

10.  Genetic counseling in melanoma.

Authors:  Celia Badenas; Paula Aguilera; Joan A Puig-Butillé; Cristina Carrera; Josep Malvehy; Susana Puig
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.