Literature DB >> 9875022

Suprasternal Doppler ultrasound for assessment of stroke distance.

C Childs1, S Goldring, W Tann, V F Hillier.   

Abstract

An assessment of a non-invasive technique for measurement of stroke distance was made using a portable Doppler ultrasound machine. The aim was to determine the measurement error of repeated stroke distance measurements (Within-observer variability) and to assess measurement agreement between two operators (between-observer variability). The measurement error (within-observer variability) for both operators was similar at approximately 2 cm. However, the measurements of the two operators (between-observer variability) did not agree well. Using the mean (SD) of three readings by each operator, the mean difference between the operators was -0.21 cm (1.96) giving a 95% confidence interval for the differences of -4.0 to +3.6 cm. There were significant positive and negative correlations between stroke distance and a variety of variables (age, height, weight, heart rate), but the relations were weak. The results indicate that the Doppler ultrasound technique for measurement of stroke distance would best be used to study trend changes in an individual patient, or subject, by a single operator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9875022      PMCID: PMC1717693          DOI: 10.1136/adc.79.3.251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  7 in total

1.  Measurement error.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-29

2.  Stroke distance--an improved measure of cardiovascular function.

Authors:  J M Rawles
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 0.729

3.  Relationship between age, body size, gender, and blood pressure and Doppler flow measurements in the aorta and pulmonary artery.

Authors:  J M Gardin; D M Davidson; M K Rohan; S Butman; M Knoll; R Garcia; S Dubria; S K Gardin; W L Henry
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Aortic blood velocity measurement in healthy adults using a simple ultrasound technique.

Authors:  D H Mowat; N E Haites; J M Rawles
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  How far is the cardiac output?

Authors:  N E Haites; F M McLennan; D H Mowat; J M Rawles
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-11-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Assessment of cardiac output by the Doppler ultrasound technique alone.

Authors:  N E Haites; F M McLennan; D H Mowat; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-02
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Non-invasive cardiac output assessment in children.

Authors:  C Childs; P Dark
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-03

Review 2.  Accuracy and repeatability of pediatric cardiac output measurement using Doppler: 20-year review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle S Chew; Jan Poelaert
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  LVOT-VTI is a Useful Indicator of Low Ventricular Function in Young Patients.

Authors:  Manchula Navaratnam; Rajesh Punn; Chandra Ramamoorthy; Theresa A Tacy
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.