Literature DB >> 17846833

An automatic correction method for the heel effect in digitized mammography images.

Marcelo Zanchetta do Nascimento1, Annie France Frère, Fernao Germano.   

Abstract

The most significant radiation field nonuniformity is the well-known Heel effect. This nonuniform beam effect has a negative influence on the results of computer-aided diagnosis of mammograms, which is frequently used for early cancer detection. This paper presents a method to correct all pixels in the mammography image according to the excess or lack on radiation to which these have been submitted as a result of the this effect. The current simulation method calculates the intensities at all points of the image plane. In the simulated image, the percentage of radiation received by all the points takes the center of the field as reference. In the digitized mammography, the percentages of the optical density of all the pixels of the analyzed image are also calculated. The Heel effect causes a Gaussian distribution around the anode-cathode axis and a logarithmic distribution parallel to this axis. Those characteristic distributions are used to determine the center of the radiation field as well as the cathode-anode axis, allowing for the automatic determination of the correlation between these two sets of data. The measurements obtained with our proposed method differs on average by 2.49 mm in the direction perpendicular to the anode-cathode axis and 2.02 mm parallel to the anode-cathode axis of commercial equipment. The method eliminates around 94% of the Heel effect in the radiological image and the objects will reflect their x-ray absorption. To evaluate this method, experimental data was taken from known objects, but could also be done with clinical and digital images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17846833      PMCID: PMC3043860          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9072-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  16 in total

1.  Detecting film-screen artifacts in mammography using a model-based approach.

Authors:  R Highnam; M Brady; R English
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Field nonuniformity correction for quantitative analysis of digitized mammograms.

Authors:  O Pawluczyk; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evaluation of cost functions for gray value matching of two-dimensional images in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Niels Dekker; Lennert S Ploeger; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Retrospective correction of the heel effect in hand radiographs.

Authors:  Gert Behiels; Frederik Maes; Dirk Vandermeulen; Paul Suetens
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E L Desautels; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for identifying histological classification of clustered microcalcifications by use of follow-up magnification mammograms.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Ryoji Watanabe; Kiyoshi Namba; Kan Takeda; Koji Yamamoto; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  X-ray scatter removal by deconvolution.

Authors:  J A Seibert; J M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Technical note: compensation for field non-uniformity on a mammographic X-ray unit.

Authors:  A R Cowen; D S Brettle; A Workman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  A comparison of computed and measured heel effect for various target angles.

Authors:  S L Fritz; W H Livingston
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film-screen combinations.

Authors:  S Meeson; K C Young; A Rust; M G Wallis; J Cooke; M L Ramsdale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of Non-Uniform Image Quality Caused by Anode Heel Effect in Digital Radiography Using Mutual Information.

Authors:  Ming-Chung Chou
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.524

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.