Literature DB >> 9872721

Estimates of the proportion of chemicals that were carcinogenic or anticarcinogenic in bioassays conducted by the National Toxicology Program.

K S Crump1, D Krewski, C Van Landingham.   

Abstract

Estimates were made of the proportion of chemicals that were carcinogenic, anticarcinogenic, or either in 397 long-term bioassays conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP). The estimates were obtained from the global pattern of p-values obtained from statistical tests applied to individual experiments. These tests accounted for multiple comparisons using a randomization procedure and were found to operate at the correct level of significance. Representative estimates of the proportion of carcinogens [with 90% confidence intervals (CI)] compared to the NTP estimates were as follows: male mice, 0.32 (CI, 0.19-0.44), NTP = 0.29; female mice, 0. 28 (CI, 0.15-0.41), NTP = 0.34; male rats, 0.35 (CI, 0.23-0.47), NTP = 0.36; female rats, 0.34 (CI, 0.21-0.46), NTP = 0.28; all sexes and species, 0.59 (CI, 0.49-0.69), NTP = 0.51. Representative estimates of the proportion of anticarcinogens were as follows: male mice, 0. 34; female mice, 0.27; male rats, 0.40; female rats, 0.44; all sexes and species, 0.66. Thus, there was as much or more evidence in this study for anticarcinogenesis as carcinogenesis. Even though the estimators used were negatively biased, it was estimated that 85% of the chemicals were either carcinogenic or anticarcinogenic at some site in some sex-species group. This suggests that most chemicals given at high enough doses will cause some sort of perturbation in tumor rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9872721      PMCID: PMC1566308          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9910783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  15 in total

1.  Statistical issues in the analysis of the long-term carcinogenicity bioassay in small rodents: an empirical evaluation of statistical decision rules.

Authors:  M Bickis; D Krewski
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1989-02

2.  A reexamination of false-positive rates for carcinogenesis studies.

Authors:  J K Haseman
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug

3.  Chemical carcinogenesis: too many rodent carcinogens.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Exact statistical tests for any carcinogenic effect in animal bioassays. II. Age-adjusted tests.

Authors:  D Farrar; K Crump
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1990-11

Review 5.  Issues and controversies surrounding qualitative strategies for identifying and forecasting cancer causing agents in the human environment.

Authors:  J Huff
Journal:  Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1993

Review 6.  Predictive strategies for selecting 379 NCI/NTP chemicals evaluated for carcinogenic potential: scientific and public health impact.

Authors:  V A Fung; J Huff; E K Weisburger; D G Hoel
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1993-05

7.  Exact statistical tests for any carcinogenic effect in animal bioassays.

Authors:  D B Farrar; K S Crump
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1988-11

8.  Effects of treatment-induced mortality and tumor-induced mortality on tests for carcinogenicity in small samples.

Authors:  A J Bailer; C J Portier
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Comparative results of 327 chemical carcinogenicity studies.

Authors:  J K Haseman; J E Huff; E Zeiger; E E McConnell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Chemicals associated with site-specific neoplasia in 1394 long-term carcinogenesis experiments in laboratory rodents.

Authors:  J Huff; J Cirvello; J Haseman; J Bucher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Sex Differences in Human and Animal Toxicology.

Authors:  Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 2.  The modification of cancer risk by chemicals.

Authors:  David J Harrison; John E Doe
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.680

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.