Literature DB >> 34484671

The modification of cancer risk by chemicals.

David J Harrison1, John E Doe2.   

Abstract

Advances in understanding of the process of carcinogenesis have undermined the concept of chemicals being classifiable as either carcinogens or non-carcinogens. Elements of carcinogenesis are happening all the time and a proportion of cancers cannot be prevented, the 'bad luck hypothesis'. Although the proportion that can be prevented is disputed, it is important to continue efforts to reduce it. Factors that increase cancer risk have been grouped into intrinsic factors that cannot be modified, and endogenous and exogenous factors that can be modified. Chemicals are exogenous factors that can be modified by risk management measures. Chemicals can alter three key rates that influence cancer risk: cell division, mutation rate per cell division, transformation rate of mutated cells to cancer. These rates can form the basis of a dynamic cancer risk model, a generic, adverse outcome pathway for carcinogenesis where chemicals are considered for their ability to modify cancer risk rather than simply whether they are classed as carcinogens or non-carcinogens. This allows the development of different strategies for assessing cancer risk that use a range of data sources and are not dependent on using long-term bioassays and epidemiology to identify carcinogens. The framework will also allow difficult questions such as the effect of less than lifetime exposures and the effect of exposures to more than one chemical to be addressed.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinogenicity; dynamic cancer risk model; mode of action; modification of cancer risk; risk assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 34484671      PMCID: PMC8403608          DOI: 10.1093/toxres/tfab064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)        ISSN: 2045-452X            Impact factor:   2.680


  26 in total

1.  Classification schemes for carcinogenicity based on hazard-identification have become outmoded and serve neither science nor society.

Authors:  Alan R Boobis; Samuel M Cohen; Vicki L Dellarco; John E Doe; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp; Angelo Moretto; Timothy P Pastoor; Rita S Schoeny; Jennifer G Seed; Douglas C Wolf
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 2.  The effect of environmental chemicals on the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Stephanie C Casey; Monica Vaccari; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; Dustin G Brown; Marion Chapellier; Joseph Christopher; Colleen S Curran; Stefano Forte; Roslida A Hamid; Petr Heneberg; Daniel C Koch; P K Krishnakumar; Ezio Laconi; Veronique Maguer-Satta; Fabio Marongiu; Lorenzo Memeo; Chiara Mondello; Jayadev Raju; Jesse Roman; Rabindra Roy; Elizabeth P Ryan; Sandra Ryeom; Hosni K Salem; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Laura Soucek; Louis Vermeulen; Jonathan R Whitfield; Jordan Woodrick; Annamaria Colacci; William H Bisson; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 1: A unified theory of carcinogenicity based on contemporary knowledge.

Authors:  Douglas C Wolf; Samuel M Cohen; Alan R Boobis; Vicki L Dellarco; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp; Angelo Moretto; Timothy P Pastoor; Rita S Schoeny; Jennifer G Seed; John E Doe
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 4.  Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 2: Current knowledge of carcinogenesis shows that categorization as a carcinogen or non-carcinogen is not scientifically credible.

Authors:  John E Doe; Alan R Boobis; Vicki Dellarco; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp; Angelo Moretto; Timothy P Pastoor; Rita S Schoeny; Jennifer G Seed; Douglas C Wolf
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 5.  Is current risk assessment of non-genotoxic carcinogens protective?

Authors:  Hedwig M Braakhuis; Wout Slob; Evelyn D Olthof; Gerrit Wolterink; Edwin P Zwart; Eric R Gremmer; Emiel Rorije; Jan van Benthem; Ruud Woutersen; Jan Willem van der Laan; Mirjam Luijten
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 6.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Evaluating intrinsic and non-intrinsic cancer risk factors.

Authors:  Song Wu; Wei Zhu; Patricia Thompson; Yusuf A Hannun
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Estimating the number of genetic mutations (hits) required for carcinogenesis based on the distribution of somatic mutations.

Authors:  Ramu Anandakrishnan; Robin T Varghese; Nicholas A Kinney; Harold R Garner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Proposed Key Characteristics of Male Reproductive Toxicants as an Approach for Organizing and Evaluating Mechanistic Evidence in Human Health Hazard Assessments.

Authors:  Xabier Arzuaga; Martyn T Smith; Catherine F Gibbons; Niels E Skakkebæk; Erin E Yost; Brandiese E J Beverly; Andrew K Hotchkiss; Russ Hauser; Rodrigo L Pagani; Steven M Schrader; Lauren Zeise; Gail S Prins
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Estimates of the proportion of chemicals that were carcinogenic or anticarcinogenic in bioassays conducted by the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  K S Crump; D Krewski; C Van Landingham
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  A new approach to the classification of carcinogenicity.

Authors:  John E Doe; Alan R Boobis; Samuel M Cohen; Vicki L Dellarco; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp; Angelo Moretto; Timothy P Pastoor; Rita S Schoeny; Jennifer G Seed; Douglas C Wolf
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.168

2.  A framework for chemical safety assessment incorporating new approach methodologies within REACH.

Authors:  Nicholas Ball; Remi Bars; Philip A Botham; Andreea Cuciureanu; Mark T D Cronin; John E Doe; Tatsiana Dudzina; Timothy W Gant; Marcel Leist; Bennard van Ravenzwaay
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.153

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.