Literature DB >> 9870022

The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance.

D N Weiss1, S R Shorofsky, R W Peters, M R Gold.   

Abstract

The impedance of internal defibrillator shocks is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy. To assess the effect of delivered energy on impedance, we studied 97 patients with 4 different lead systems. The lead systems evaluated were two epicardial patches, a hybrid system of a patch and right atrial coil, a dual coil transvenous lead and a transvenous lead with a subcutaneous patch. Impedances were measured for 6 shock energies between 0.1 and 30 J. Shock impedance increased at low energies for all lead systems (p < 0.001), although the rate of increase varied markedly between systems. The energy factor (FE), which is the ratio of impedances for the 0.1 and 10 J shocks, was least for the platinum transvenous lead (1.2 +/- 0.02) and greatest for the titanium hybrid lead (4.2 +/- 0.2). Reversing the polarity of the hybrid lead markedly attenuated the impedance rise. These findings indicate that there is at least a modest rise (20%) of shock impedance at very low delivered energies. The largest increases noted with titanium lead systems are primarily due to polarization. Titanium transvenous leads should be avoided when low energy shocks are utilized such as for the cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9870022     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009745222443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  20 in total

1.  Chronic rise in defibrillation threshold with a hybrid lead system.

Authors:  R V Tummala; D R Riggio; R W Peters; S R Shorofsky; M R Gold
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  TiN: a suitable coating for defibrillator electrodes?

Authors:  B Stroetmann; G Siemsen; B Straehler
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Optimal electrode configuration for pectoral transvenous implantable defibrillator without an active can.

Authors:  C D Swerdlow; S Davie; R M Kass; P S Chen; C Hwang; W J Mandel; E S Gang; S Raissi; C T Peter
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The implanted defibrillator: relation of defibrillating lead configuration and clinical variables to defibrillation threshold.

Authors:  P J Troup; P D Chapman; G N Olinger; L H Kleinman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Effect of waveform tilt on defibrillation thresholds in humans.

Authors:  S R Shorofsky; A H Foster; M R Gold
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-05

6.  Strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation.

Authors:  M R Gold; S R Shorofsky
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  A simplified, single-lead unipolar transvenous cardioversion-defibrillation system.

Authors:  G H Bardy; G Johnson; J E Poole; G L Dolack; P J Kudenchuk; D Kelso; R Mitchell; R Mehra; B Hofer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Current-based versus energy-based ventricular defibrillation: a prospective study.

Authors:  B B Lerman; J P DiMarco; D E Haines
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Electrode system influence on biphasic waveform defibrillation efficacy in humans.

Authors:  G H Bardy; C Troutman; G Johnson; R Mehra; J E Poole; G L Dolack; P J Kudenchuk; D M Gartman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Clinical experience, complications, and survival in 70 patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator.

Authors:  D S Echt; K Armstrong; P Schmidt; P E Oyer; E B Stinson; R A Winkle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of shock polarity on defibrillation thresholds with a hybrid patch-coil lead system.

Authors:  Eric J Rashba; Stephen R Shorofsky; Robert W Peters; Michael R Gold
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs.

Authors:  Mark W Kroll; Charles D Swerdlow
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 1.900

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.