Literature DB >> 8339416

A simplified, single-lead unipolar transvenous cardioversion-defibrillation system.

G H Bardy1, G Johnson, J E Poole, G L Dolack, P J Kudenchuk, D Kelso, R Mitchell, R Mehra, B Hofer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators provide significant advantages in the treatment of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. However, present technology requires considerable electrophysiology expertise, multiple incisions, and long operative times for successful implementation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this study, we present a prototype of a new, easy-to-insert unipolar transvenous defibrillation system that has the reliability of epicardial defibrillation but the ease of pacemaker insertion. This system incorporates a single anodal right ventricular defibrillation electrode using a 65% tilt biphasic pulse delivered to a 108-cm2 surface area pulse generator titanium alloy shell as an active cathode placed in a left infraclavicular pocket. Testing of this system was performed before implantation of a standard nonthoracotomy-transvenous defibrillation system in 40 consecutive patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. The simplified unipolar single-lead system resulted in a defibrillation threshold of 9.3 +/- 6.0 J with 37 of 40 patients (93%) having a defibrillation threshold of less than 20 J. Moreover, the unipolar defibrillation system was efficiently used requiring only 3.4 +/- 0.8 ventricular fibrillation inductions to measure the defibrillation threshold and 100 +/- 28 minutes to implement.
CONCLUSIONS: This new unipolar transvenous defibrillation system is as simple to insert as a pacemaker, requires few ventricular fibrillation inductions, demands less technical expertise, and provides defibrillation at energy levels comparable to that reported with epicardial lead systems. It should substantially reduce the morbidity, time, and cost of defibrillator implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8339416     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.2.543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of pectoral and abdominal transvenous defibrillator implantation: analysis of costs and outcomes.

Authors:  M R Gold; D Froman; N G Kavesh; R W Peters; A H Foster; S R Shorofsky
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.

Authors:  Jörg Neuzner; Jörg Carlsson
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Experience with unipolar pectoral defibrillation.

Authors:  R K Reddy; G H Bardy
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

4.  Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.

Authors:  M Bahu; B P Knight; R Weiss; S J Hahn; R Goyal; E G Daoud; K C Man; F Morady; S A Strickberger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Early postoperative rise in defibrillation threshold associated with hematoma formation with unipolar defibrillation system.

Authors:  D Y Yazmajian; D Schwartzman; D J Callans; C D Gottieb; F E Marchlinski
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance.

Authors:  D N Weiss; S R Shorofsky; R W Peters; M R Gold
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators?

Authors:  E Alt; F Evans; P D Wolf; J Pasquantonio; L Stotts; S Heinz; A Schömig
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Cardiology--II: Treatment of heart failure and atrial fibrillation and arrhythmias.

Authors:  J McMurray; A Rankin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-17

9.  [Influence of waveform and configuration of electrodes on the defibrillation threshold of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators].

Authors:  M Block; D Hammel; G Breithardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

10.  Effect of shock polarity on defibrillation thresholds with a hybrid patch-coil lead system.

Authors:  Eric J Rashba; Stephen R Shorofsky; Robert W Peters; Michael R Gold
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.