Literature DB >> 7639162

Optimal electrode configuration for pectoral transvenous implantable defibrillator without an active can.

C D Swerdlow1, S Davie, R M Kass, P S Chen, C Hwang, W J Mandel, E S Gang, S Raissi, C T Peter.   

Abstract

A new 83 cm3 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) designed for pectoral implantation has been implanted most frequently using right ventricular and superior vena cava (RV-->SVC) electrodes; a patch electrode (RV-->patch + SVC) has been added when necessary to decrease the defibrillation threshold (DFT). The goal of this prospective study was to compare biphasic waveform DFTs for 3 electrode configurations: RV-->patch, RV-->SVC, and RV-->patch + SVC in 25 consecutive patients. The patch was positioned in a left retro-pectoral pocket, and the SVC electrode was positioned with the tip at the junction of the SVC and innominate vein. In the first 15 patients, all 3 electrode configurations were tested in random order; in the last 10 patients, only the RV-->patch and RV-->patch + SVC configurations were tested. In the first 15 patients, the stored-energy DFT for the RV-->SVC configuration (15.2 +/- 7.7 J) was higher (p < 0.001) than the DFT for the RV-->patch configuration (11.3 +/- 6.2 J) and the RV-->patch + SVC configuration (10.0 +/- 5.8 J). For all 25 patients, the DFT was lower for the RV-->patch + SVC configuration (9.7 +/- 5.1 J) than for the RV-->patch configuration (12.4 +/- 6.6 J, p = 0.005). The pathway resistance was highest for the RV-->patch configuration (72 +/- 9 omega), lower for the RV-->SVC configuration (63 +/- 6 omega, p < 0.01), and lowest for the RV-->patch + SVC configuration (46 +/- 3 omega, p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7639162     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80103-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  2 in total

1.  Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.

Authors:  M Bahu; B P Knight; R Weiss; S J Hahn; R Goyal; E G Daoud; K C Man; F Morady; S A Strickberger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance.

Authors:  D N Weiss; S R Shorofsky; R W Peters; M R Gold
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.900

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.