Literature DB >> 9868722

Primary temporary AO plate reconstruction of the mandible.

H Schöning1, R Emshoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the incidence of complications and revisions after primary temporary AO plate reconstructions of the mandible performed from 1971 through 1996. STUDY
DESIGN: In a retrospective record review, the data of 51 patients undergoing primary temporary AO plate reconstructions after composite mandibular resection were analyzed according to age, gender, date of reconstruction, anatomic location of reconstruction, use of additional radiotherapy and/or flap surgery, and incidence of associated complications and revisions.
RESULTS: Associated complications and revisions accompanying primary temporary AO plate reconstructions were evaluated through use of the incidence rates of associated complications (IACs) and revisions (IARs), which are reported as the numbers of associated complications and revisions, respectively, per 100 patients. Of the entire sample, the highest incidence rate of associated complications was associated with infection (33.5); this was followed by the rates for plate exposure (27.9) and plate fracture (10.7). With an overall incidence rate of 38.3 revisions per 100 patients, the corresponding site-related incidence rates of associated revisions were found to be 55.0 for reconstructions of the anterior mandible crossing the midline, 37.1 for those of the body segment of the mandible, and 31.1 for reconstructions involving the ramus and/or condyle area of the mandible. Revision rates were observed to be significantly higher in irradiated (53.6 vs 31.5) and non-flap-added reconstructions (43.2 vs 24.8). Analysis of treatment group-related incidences revealed irradiated non-flap-added reconstructions to be associated with the highest failure rates, whereas additional flap surgery resulted in a significant reduction in complications (50.0 vs 108.0) and revisions (20.0 vs 65.7).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed primary temporary AO plate reconstructions after composite mandibular resection to be associated with a high rate of complications and revisions. The results emphasize the need to relate outcome measures to site-related and treatment-related parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9868722     DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90201-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  10 in total

1.  [Stress tests of reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects].

Authors:  W-D Knoll; A Gaida; P Maurer
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-04-30

2.  Reconstruction of head and neck defects: a systematic approach to treatment.

Authors:  Deepak Kademani; Samir Mardini; Steven L Moran
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Comparison of Mechanical Stability between Fibular Free Flap Reconstruction versus Locking Mandibular Reconstruction Plate Fixation.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Chung; Eul-Sik Yoon; Seung-Ha Park; Byung-Il Lee; Hyon-Surk Kim; Hi-Jin You
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-14

4.  [On the indications for and morbidity of segmental resection of the mandible for squamous cell carcinoma in the lower oral cavity].

Authors:  A Abler; M Roser; D Weingart
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-05

5.  Reconstruction plates used in the surgery for mandibular discontinuity defect.

Authors:  Guk-Jin Seol; Eun-Gyu Jeon; Jong-Sung Lee; So-Young Choi; Jin-Wook Kim; Tae-Geon Kwon; Jun-Young Paeng
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-26

6.  [Computer assisted chewing power in patients with segmental resection of the mandible].

Authors:  P Maurer; H Pistner; J Schubert
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-01

7.  Pre-contoured reconstruction plate fabricated via three-dimensional printed bending support.

Authors:  In-Seok Song; Jae-Jun Ryu; Young-Jun Choi; Ui-Lyong Lee
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 8.  Recent developments of functional scaffolds for craniomaxillofacial bone tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Yukihiko Kinoshita; Hatsuhiko Maeda
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-09-15

9.  Risk factors and surgical refinements of postresective mandibular reconstruction: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Akiko Sakakibara; Kazunobu Hashikawa; Satoshi Yokoo; Shunsuke Sakakibara; Takahide Komori; Shinya Tahara
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-08-06

Review 10.  Patient-specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set-ups.

Authors:  Bram Barteld Jan Merema; Joep Kraeima; Haye H Glas; Fred K L Spijkervet; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.511

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.