Literature DB >> 16315074

[Computer assisted chewing power in patients with segmental resection of the mandible].

P Maurer1, H Pistner, J Schubert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of tumors of the oral cavity often requires a segmental resection of the mandible. This always implies a considerable loss in function and aesthetics. The aim of the present study was to measure the chewing force obtained by patients after mandibular resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a group of 20 patients (twelve males, eight females, average age 59 years), chewing force were registered by means of a computerized measurement device. In 16 patients, the defect was bridged by a reconstruction plate, in three with an iliac bone graft stabilized by miniplates, and in one patient with only two miniplates.
RESULTS: The maximum value in the molar region was 186 N und the minimum was 28 N. The average bite force in the molar region reached 81.1 N (+/-46.1) with 42.9 N (+/-35.7) in the front region. The highest value was registered in a patient with an iliac bone graft without soft tissue defect. The lowest was found in patients with bony chin defects.
CONCLUSION: Based on these results, a reduction of 76% in the molar region and 59% in the incisor region was observed. These values might be helpful in providing a more realistic definition of the functional loadings found in patients after mandibular resection, which in turn may help in the development of new reconstruction devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16315074     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-005-0656-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  7 in total

1.  Occlusal force after partial mandibular resection.

Authors:  M Marunick; B E Mathes; B B Klein; M Seyedsadr
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Primary temporary AO plate reconstruction of the mandible.

Authors:  H Schöning; R Emshoff
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1998-12

3.  Assessment of plate use for mandibular reconstruction: has changing technology made a difference?

Authors:  D W Klotch; T J Gal; R L Gal
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  The masticatory movements of patients after major oral surgery.

Authors:  H F Atkinson; R W Shepherd
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  A comparison of masticatory function in patients with or without reconstruction of the mandible.

Authors:  D A Curtis; O Plesh; A J Miller; T A Curtis; A Sharma; R Schweitzer; R L Hilsinger; L Schour; M Singer
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 6.  Experience with AO reconstruction plates after partial mandibular resection involving its continuity.

Authors:  V Freitag; B Hell; H Fischer
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Orofacial and mandibular reconstruction with the iliac crest free flap: a review of 60 cases and a new method of classification.

Authors:  D D Jewer; J B Boyd; R T Manktelow; R M Zuker; I B Rosen; P J Gullane; L E Rotstein; J E Freeman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.730

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts induced by distinct plates for osseous fixation: an in vitro study @ 3 T.

Authors:  Carsten Rendenbach; Max Schoellchen; Julie Bueschel; Tobias Gauer; Jan Sedlacik; Daniel Kutzner; Pekka K Vallittu; Max Heiland; Ralf Smeets; Jens Fiehler; Susanne Siemonsen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction.

Authors:  Julian Lommen; Lara Schorn; Christoph Sproll; Norbert R Kübler; Luis Fernando Nicolini; Ricarda Merfort; Ayimire Dilimulati; Frank Hildebrand; Majeed Rana; Johannes Greven
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  A Case of an Extensive Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumor in the Mandible Reconstructed with a Custom-Made Total Joint Prosthesis.

Authors:  Payam Farzad
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-01-05

4.  [Condylar resection alone versus alloplastic reconstruction. Comparison of long-term functional and cosmetic results].

Authors:  J K-H Meier; R Staudenmaier; N Kleinsasser; T E Reichert; O Driemel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Biomechanical In Vitro Study on the Stability of Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Mandibular Reconstruction Plates: A Comparison Between Selective Laser Melted, Milled, and Hand-Bent Plates.

Authors:  Robin Kasper; Karsten Winter; Sebastian Pietzka; Alexander Schramm; Frank Wilde
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-28

6.  [New condylar head system for temporary condylar reconstruction in ablative tumour surgery].

Authors:  O Driemel; E R Carlson; U Müller-Richter; A Moralis; S Lienhard; S Wagener; T E Reichert
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.