Literature DB >> 32372548

Patient-specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set-ups.

Bram Barteld Jan Merema1, Joep Kraeima1, Haye H Glas1, Fred K L Spijkervet1, Max J H Witjes1.   

Abstract

The use of finite element analysis (FEA) has increased rapidly over the last decennia and has become a popular tool to design implants, osteosynthesis plates and prostheses. With increasing computer capacity and the availability of software applications, it has become easier to employ the FEA. However, there seems to be no consensus on the input variables that should be applied to representative FEA models of the human mandible. This review aims to find a consensus on how to define the representative input factors for a FEA model of the human mandible. A literature search carried out in the PubMed and Embase database resulted in 137 matches. Seven papers were included in this current study. Within the search results, only a few FEA models had been validated. The material properties and FEA approaches varied considerably, and the available validations are not strong enough for a general consensus. Further validations are required, preferably using the same measuring workflow to obtain insight into the broad array of mandibular variations. A lot of work is still required to establish validated FEA settings and to prevent assumptions when it comes to FEA applications.
© 2020 The Authors. Oral Diseases published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD-CAM; finite element analysis; in vitro validation; mandibular reconstruction; patient-specific modelling; prosthesis and implants

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32372548      PMCID: PMC7818111          DOI: 10.1111/odi.13381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Dis        ISSN: 1354-523X            Impact factor:   3.511


  61 in total

1.  Free vascularized flaps for reconstruction of the mandible: complications, success, and dental rehabilitation.

Authors:  Johannes T M van Gemert; Robert J J van Es; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; Andries van der Bilt; Ron Koole; Ellen M Van Cann
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 2.  Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update.

Authors:  Harold M Frost
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2003-12

3.  Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  R T Hart; V V Hennebel; N Thongpreda; W C Van Buskirk; R C Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Cumulative damage and the response of human bone in two-step loading fatigue.

Authors:  P Zioupos; A Casinos
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Ex-vivo and in vitro validation of an innovative mandibular condyle implant concept.

Authors:  António Ramos; Luis M Gonzalez-Perez; Pedro Infante-Cossio; Michel Mesnard
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Mandibular stiffness in humans: numerical predictions.

Authors:  I Ichim; M V Swain; J A Kieser
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces.

Authors:  J H Koolstra; T M van Eijden; W A Weijs; M Naeije
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development.

Authors:  L Borchers; P Reichart
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Mechanical stress in plates for bridging reconstruction mandibular defects and purposes of double plate reinforcement.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoefert; Roberto Taier
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Biomechanical response of the maxillofacial skeleton to transpalatal orthopedic force in a unilateral palatal cleft.

Authors:  Pawan Gautam; Linping Zhao; Pravin Patel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Precision medicine using patient-specific modelling: state of the art and perspectives in dental practice.

Authors:  Pierre Lahoud; Reinhilde Jacobs; Philippe Boisse; Mostafa EzEldeen; Maxime Ducret; Raphael Richert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  A Contemporary Approach to Non-Invasive 3D Determination of Individual Masticatory Muscle Forces: A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Bram B J Merema; Jelbrich J Sieswerda; Frederik K L Spijkervet; Joep Kraeima; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 3.  Patient-specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set-ups.

Authors:  Bram Barteld Jan Merema; Joep Kraeima; Haye H Glas; Fred K L Spijkervet; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.511

4.  3D Printing Experimental Validation of the Finite Element Analysis of the Maxillofacial Model.

Authors:  Jingheng Shu; Haotian Luo; Yuanli Zhang; Zhan Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.