PURPOSE: To study the feasibility and safety of stent-supported angioplasty in the treatment of atherosclerotic stenoses of the extracranial carotid arteries. METHODS: Carotid angioplasty was attempted in 174 arteries (163 patients: 126 males; mean age: 71 +/- 10 years, range 47 to 93). Mean lesion length was 15.1 +/- 4.1 mm, and mean percent stenosis was 83.8% +/- 7.3% (reference diameter 5.8 +/- 0.7 mm). The majority (106, 65%) were asymptomatic (51% of all patients had severe coronary disease, 32% had peripheral vascular diseases). Patients underwent independent neurological examination, computed tomography, duplex ultrasonography, and angiography preprocedurally, 24 hours after the procedure, and at 6-month follow-up intervals. Most (142, 82%) carotid arteries were treated without cerebral protection, but a protective triple coaxial catheter was used in 32 (18%) patients. Stents (primarily Palmaz and Wallstent) were deployed routinely in all cases; 18% were implanted without predilation. RESULTS: Immediate technical success was 173 of 174 (99.4%) (1 access failure referred electively to surgery). Eight (4.6%) neurological complications occurred in the periprocedural period: 3 transient ischemic attacks, 2 minor strokes, and 3 major strokes (1 amaurosis and 2 hemiplegias). Two major complications developed despite cerebral protection. There were no deaths or myocardial infarctions and only 3 cervical access site hematomas. Over a mean 12.7 +/- 9.2 month follow-up (range 1 to 36), no ipsilateral neurological complications have been seen. There were 4 (2.3%) restenoses (3 redilated, 1 treated medically) and 1 mild Palmaz stent compression, all found within the first 6 months. Primary and secondary patencies at 3 years are 96% and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Angioplasty with routine stenting seems feasible and safe for treating certain types of carotid stenoses even in high-surgical risk patients; however, randomized trials are necessary before this treatment can be offered as an alternative to endarterectomy.
PURPOSE: To study the feasibility and safety of stent-supported angioplasty in the treatment of atherosclerotic stenoses of the extracranial carotid arteries. METHODS: Carotid angioplasty was attempted in 174 arteries (163 patients: 126 males; mean age: 71 +/- 10 years, range 47 to 93). Mean lesion length was 15.1 +/- 4.1 mm, and mean percent stenosis was 83.8% +/- 7.3% (reference diameter 5.8 +/- 0.7 mm). The majority (106, 65%) were asymptomatic (51% of all patients had severe coronary disease, 32% had peripheral vascular diseases). Patients underwent independent neurological examination, computed tomography, duplex ultrasonography, and angiography preprocedurally, 24 hours after the procedure, and at 6-month follow-up intervals. Most (142, 82%) carotid arteries were treated without cerebral protection, but a protective triple coaxial catheter was used in 32 (18%) patients. Stents (primarily Palmaz and Wallstent) were deployed routinely in all cases; 18% were implanted without predilation. RESULTS: Immediate technical success was 173 of 174 (99.4%) (1 access failure referred electively to surgery). Eight (4.6%) neurological complications occurred in the periprocedural period: 3 transient ischemic attacks, 2 minor strokes, and 3 major strokes (1 amaurosis and 2 hemiplegias). Two major complications developed despite cerebral protection. There were no deaths or myocardial infarctions and only 3 cervical access site hematomas. Over a mean 12.7 +/- 9.2 month follow-up (range 1 to 36), no ipsilateral neurological complications have been seen. There were 4 (2.3%) restenoses (3 redilated, 1 treated medically) and 1 mild Palmaz stent compression, all found within the first 6 months. Primary and secondary patencies at 3 years are 96% and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Angioplasty with routine stenting seems feasible and safe for treating certain types of carotid stenoses even in high-surgical risk patients; however, randomized trials are necessary before this treatment can be offered as an alternative to endarterectomy.
Authors: C C Phatouros; R T Higashida; A M Malek; P M Meyers; T E Lempert; C F Dowd; V V Halbach Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Joachim Berkefeld; Bernd Turowski; Andreas Dietz; Heinrich Lanfermann; Matthias Sitzer; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Helmuth Steinmetz; Friedhelm E Zanella Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Roham Moftakhar; Aquilla S Turk; David B Niemann; Sayed Hussain; Sharad Rajpal; Thomas Cook; Madeleine Geraghty; Beverly Aagaard-Kienitz; Patrick A Turski; George C Newman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: G Stankovic; F Liistro; S Moshiri; C Briguori; N Corvaja; G Gimelli; A Chieffo; M Montorfano; L Finci; V Spanos; C Di Mario; A Colombo Journal: Heart Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.994