Literature DB >> 12231597

Carotid artery stenting in the first 100 consecutive patients: results and follow up.

G Stankovic1, F Liistro, S Moshiri, C Briguori, N Corvaja, G Gimelli, A Chieffo, M Montorfano, L Finci, V Spanos, C Di Mario, A Colombo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting is now used as an alternative to surgical endarterectomy. The availability of cerebral protection systems has expanded the area of application of this procedure.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and immediate and late clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous carotid interventions.
METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2000, 100 consecutive patients with 102 carotid artery stenoses were treated (71 men, 29 women, mean (SD) age 67 (8) years): 49 had coronary artery disease, 28 had previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). On the basis of the Mayo Clinic carotid endarterectomy risk scale, 73 patients were grade III-IV and 13 grade VI.
RESULTS: Baseline diameter stenosis was 78.8 (10)%, with a mean lesion length of 12.6 (5.8) mm. Angiographic success was obtained in 99 lesions (97.0%) with a final diameter stenosis of 2.4 (3.5)%. Procedural success was obtained in 96 patients (96%). Selective cannulation of three carotid arteries was impossible owing to severe vessel tortuosity. Carotid stenting was performed in 97 of the treated lesions, and protection devices were used in 67 lesions. In-hospital complications occurred in seven patients (six TIA, one (category 1) minor stroke). No major stroke or death occurred. All patients were discharged from the hospital after an average of 2.5 days. At 12 (6.2) months of follow up restenosis occurred in three patients (3.4%) (one patient with carotid occlusion had TIA). Six patients had died: two from cerebrovascular events (5 and 11 months after the procedure) and four from cardiovascular causes.
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stenting appears feasible and safe, with few major complications. Long term follow up is affected by a high incidence of cardiovascular mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12231597      PMCID: PMC1767376          DOI: 10.1136/heart.88.4.381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  24 in total

1.  Duplex criteria for determination of 50% or greater carotid stenosis.

Authors:  D G Neschis; F J Lexa; J T Davis; J P Carpenter
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Carotid endarterectomy. Complications and preoperative assessment of risk.

Authors:  T M Sundt; B A Sandok; J P Whisnant
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  B Reimers; N Corvaja; S Moshiri; S Saccà; R Albiero; C Di Mario; P Pascotto; A Colombo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale.

Authors:  T Brott; H P Adams; C P Olinger; J R Marler; W G Barsan; J Biller; J Spilker; R Holleran; R Eberle; V Hertzberg
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  C M Winslow; D H Solomon; M R Chassin; J Kosecoff; N J Merrick; R H Brook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Management of neurological complications of carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  M H Wholey; M H Wholey; W A Tan; B Toursarkissian; S Bailey; G Eles; C Jarmolowski
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  Catheter dilatation of proximal carotid stenosis during distal bifurcation endarterectomy.

Authors:  C W Kerber; L D Cromwell; O L Loehden
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Neurological monitoring during carotid artery stenting: the Duck Squeezing Test.

Authors:  C R Gomez; G S Roubin; L S Dean; S Iyer; J J Vitek; M W Liu; V R Wadlington; J B Terry
Journal:  J Endovasc Surg       Date:  1999-11

9.  Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement.

Authors:  M H Wholey; M Wholey; K Mathias; G S Roubin; E B Diethrich; M Henry; S Bailey; P Bergeron; G Dorros; G Eles; P Gaines; C R Gomez; B Gray; J Guimaraens; R Higashida; D S Ho; B Katzen; A Kambara; V Kumar; J C Laborde; M Leon; M Lim; H Londero; J Mesa; A Musacchio; S Myla; S Ramee; A Rodriquez; K Rosenfield; N Sakai; F Shawl; H Sievert; G Teitelbaum; J G Theron; P Vaclav; C Vozzi; J S Yadav; S I Yoshimura
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  In stent restenosis predictors after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Mirco Cosottini; Maria Chiara Michelassi; Walter Bencivelli; Guido Lazzarotti; Silvia Picchietti; Giovanni Orlandi; Giuliano Parenti; Michele Puglioli
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-14

2.  Utility of covered stents for extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Barbaros E Cil; Erhan Akpinar; Bora Peynircioglu; Saruhan Cekirge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Early outcomes after carotid angioplasty with stenting performed by neurologists.

Authors:  Lokesh Bathala; Fenglei Zhu; Minmin Ma; Yuping Ma; Gelin Xu; Xinfeng Liu
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.383

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.