Literature DB >> 9859038

[Diagnostic approach and optimal treatment of aortic valve stenosis].

D Horstkotte1, C Piper, M Wiemer, H P Schultheiss.   

Abstract

The slow progression of valvular aortic stenosis enables the left ventricular myocardium to adapt itself to the increasing afterload. When myocardial adaption is exhausted, surgical intervention is urgent, the prognosis, however, is already limited. To quantify the hemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis, transaortic pressure gradients (dp) measured by Doppler echocardiography or hemodynamically are inappropriate, because dp is significantly dependent on the transaortic flow volume. In severe aortic stenosis, despite constant narrowing of the aortic valve area, the reduced stroke volume results in decreasing transaortic pressure gradients. With aortic valve resistance or transaortic pressure loss (PL)--the quotient of pressure gradient and stroke volume--the hemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis can be described accurately. If PL is known, a decompensated aortic stenosis (PL > 1 mm Hg/ml) may be differentiated from myocardial failure of another etiology and a concomitant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. With respect to medical therapy, the prevention of bacterial endocarditis and thromboembolic complications is important. Knowing the potential danger of syncopies and ventricular arrhythmias during exercise with increasing severity of aortic stenosis, patients have to be informed about their limited functional capacity. The occurrence of typical symptoms during the natural history of chronic aortic stenosis (e.g. dizziness, syncopes, angina pectoris, arrhythmias) manifestation of ST-T-alterations or silent myocardial ischemias and demonstration of an inadequate myocardial adaptation to the chronic pressure overload in asymptomatic patients are accepted indications for a surgical intervention. If the indication for surgery remains uncertain, stress tests (e.g. radionuclidventriculography) may be performed to demonstrate an exhausted myocardial adaptation. If the PL and the severity of aortic valve/anulus calcification is known, the progression of a chronic aortic stenosis can be estimated. This might be important, if a cardiosurgical intervention has to be performed for other indications and aortic stenosis is co-existent but does not require an intervention at that time. For prognostic reasons myocardial decompensation due to aortic stenosis is an indication for an urgent surgical intervention. Attempts for medical recompensation or bridging strategies (e.g. balloon valvotomy) worsens the prognosis significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9859038     DOI: 10.1007/bf03043404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  16 in total

Review 1.  Afterload mismatch and preload reserve: a conceptual framework for the analysis of ventricular function.

Authors:  J Ross
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1976 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 2.  [Prevention of endocarditis 1998--what is reliable?].

Authors:  D Horstkotte; J Niebel
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  1998-09

Review 3.  Aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J Ross; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Exercise testing in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J E Atwood; S Kawanishi; J Myers; V F Froelicher
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients.

Authors:  C R deFilippi; D L Willett; M E Brickner; C P Appleton; C W Yancy; E J Eichhorn; P A Grayburn
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Angina pectoris in patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. Mechanisms and pathophysiological concepts.

Authors:  B K Julius; M Spillmann; G Vassalli; B Villari; F R Eberli; O M Hess
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  The natural history of aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  D Horstkotte; F Loogen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  Pathological hypertrophy and cardiac interstitium. Fibrosis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

Authors:  K T Weber; C G Brilla
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Left ventricular myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before, intermediate, and late after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  H P Krayenbuehl; O M Hess; E S Monrad; J Schneider; G Mall; M Turina
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Systemic and left ventricular responses to exercise stress in asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  C A Clyne; J A Arrighi; B J Maron; V Dilsizian; R O Bonow; R O Cannon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  D Horstkotte
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-07

Review 2.  [Modern aspects in the management of acquired heart valve lesions].

Authors:  D Horstkotte; H P Schultheiss
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.443

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.