Literature DB >> 128034

Afterload mismatch and preload reserve: a conceptual framework for the analysis of ventricular function.

J Ross.   

Abstract

A two-dimensional framework can be used for considering the characteristics of left ventricular ejection in terms of the appropriateness of the matching between afterload and the level of inotropic state, as modulated by the preload reserve. An afterload mismatch (reduced velocity and extent of shortening) can be induced acutely in the normal heart under controlled conditions if the preload is not allowed to compensate for an increased afterload, or if the limit of preload (Frank-Starling) reserve has been reached. In the intact circulation the normal heart is sensitive to some degree to acute changes in afterload, perhaps due to impaired venous return; but under basal resting conditions the ejection phase measures (such as the ejection fraction and the mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening or VCF, corrected for heart size) encompass a relatively narrow range. This finding, and the lack of change in ejection phase measures after the normal heart has adapted to a chronic pressure or volume overload, provides justification for the use of ejection phase indices for detecting depressed inotropic state under basal conditions. When there is mild depression of myocardial inotropic state, with or without accompanying mechanical overload, enhanced preload may allow full compensation, but acute pressure loading may allow early detection of a less than normal preload reserve. When the inotropic state is substantially reduced, however, a mismatch between afterload and contractility (a reduction in mean VCF) will become evident even in the basal state (venous return being presumed to be adequate under these conditions). The concept of afterload mismatch with limited preload reserve provides an explanation for the value of ejection phase indices compared to isovolunic phase measures in assessing the basal level of inotropic state: the former may be more reliable because they are sensitive to afterload. The effects and implications of therapeutic afterload reduction as modulated by the preload also are understood within this framework.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 128034     DOI: 10.1016/0033-0620(76)90021-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 0033-0620            Impact factor:   8.194


  53 in total

1.  Clinical significance of mean circulatory filling pressure and cardiac preload under anesthesia.

Authors:  K Ohishi; T Muteki; M Shinozaki; T Aragaki; M Tagami; D Shimizu; T Takagi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1987-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Atrophied cardiomyocytes and their potential for rescue and recovery of ventricular function.

Authors:  Mark R Heckle; David M Flatt; Yao Sun; Salvatore Mancarella; Tony N Marion; Ivan C Gerling; Karl T Weber
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Improvements in global longitudinal strain after transcatheter aortic valve replacement according to race.

Authors:  Aamir H Twing; Brody Slostad; Christina Anderson; Sreenivas Konda; Elliott M Groves; Mayank M Kansal
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-04-15

4.  Pharmacologic and hemodynamic influences on the rate of isovolumic left ventricular relaxation in the normal conscious dog.

Authors:  J S Karliner; M M LeWinter; F Mahler; R Engler; R A O'Rourke
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  [Modern aspects in the management of acquired heart valve lesions].

Authors:  D Horstkotte; H P Schultheiss
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Haemodynamic response to graded exercise during chronic beta-adrenergic blockade with bunitrolol, an agent with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity.

Authors:  T Reybrouck; A Amery; R Fagard; L Billiet
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977-12-16       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Surgical considerations in aortic valve disease.

Authors:  P O Daily
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1977-06

8.  The response to Trendelenburg position is minimally affected by underlying hemodynamic conditions in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Abraham Sonny; Daniel I Sessler; Jing You; Babak Kateby Kashy; Sheryar Sarwar; Akhil K Singh; Shiva Sale; Andrej Alfirevic; Andra E Duncan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Effects of incoordination on left ventricular force-velocity relation in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  X Y Jin; J R Pepper; D G Gibson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  The pathophysiology of diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Thanh Trung Phan; Michael Frenneaux
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2010-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.