Literature DB >> 9857881

Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in women with chest pain and unknown coronary artery disease.

L Cortigiani1, C Dodi, E A Paolini, D Bernardi, G Bruno, E Nannini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study we sought to investigate the prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in women referred for chest pain, having unknown coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: The noninvasive identification of a high-risk subgroup among women with chest pain and unknown coronary artery disease is an unresolved task to date.
METHODS: A total of 456 women (mean [+/-SD] age 63+/-10 years) underwent pharmacological stress echocardiography with either dipyridamole (n = 305) or dobutamine (n = 151) for evaluation of chest pain and were followed-up for 32+/-19 months. None of them had a previous diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
RESULTS: No major complication occurred during stress testing. Five tests (1.1%) were prematurely interrupted because of the appearance of side effects. Echocardiographic positivity was identified in 51 patients. During the follow-up, 23 cardiac events occurred: 3 deaths, 10 infarctions and 10 cases of unstable angina; an additional 21 patients underwent coronary revascularization. At Cox analysis, the echocardiographic evidence of ischemia was found as the only independent predictor of hard cardiac events (death, infarction) (odds ratio [OR] = 27.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = (6.5 to 115.5; p = 0.0000). When spontaneous cardiac events (death, infarction and unstable angina) were considered as endpoints, the positive echocardiographic result (OR = 23.9; 95% CI = 8.6 to 66.8; p = 0.0000) and family history of coronary artery disease (OR = 3.7; 95% CI = 1.5 to 9.1; p = 0.0037) were independently correlated with prognosis. By using an interactive stepwise procedure, the prognostic value of stress echocardiography was found to be incremental to that provided by clinical variables, both considering hard and spontaneous cardiac events as endpoints. The 3-year survival rate for the negative and the positive population was respectively, 99.5% and 69.5% (p = 0.0000) considering hard cardiac events, 99.2% and 50.6% (p = 0.0000) considering spontaneous cardiac events.
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological stress echocardiography is safe, highly feasible and effective in risk stratification of women with chest pain and unknown coronary artery disease, also when hard endpoints are considered. Its use can have relevant implications in daily clinical practice for selection of patients needing further investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9857881     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00477-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

1.  Gender-based prognostic value of pharmacological cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing: head-to-head comparison of adenosine perfusion and dobutamine wall motion imaging.

Authors:  Cosima Jahnke; Vesna Furundzija; Rolf Gebker; Robert Manka; Michael Frick; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Nikolaus Marx; Ingo Paetsch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Stress Echocardiography in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Sothinathan Gurunathan; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Prognostic value of stress echocardiography in women with high (> or = 80%) probability of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J I Davar; E B Roberts; J G Coghlan; T R Evans; D P Lipkin
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Gender and microvascular angina.

Authors:  Lynn Nugent; Puja K Mehta; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Headache response to glyceryl trinitrate in patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D H Hsi; A Roshandel; N Singh; T Szombathy; Z S Meszaros
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  The role of stress echocardiography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemia in women.

Authors:  Ratnasari Padang; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  A multicenter, prospective study to evaluate the use of contrast stress echocardiography in early menopausal women at risk for coronary artery disease: trial design and baseline findings.

Authors:  Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Mathieu Bernier; Mary E Hagen; Susan Eifert-Rain; Dalene Bott-Kitslaar; Susan Wilansky; Ramon Castello; Gajanan Bhat; Patricia A Pellikka; Patricia J M Best; Sharonne N Hayes; Sharon L Mulvagh
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Rosa Sicari; Lauro Cortigiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.062

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.