Literature DB >> 21732028

Gender-based prognostic value of pharmacological cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing: head-to-head comparison of adenosine perfusion and dobutamine wall motion imaging.

Cosima Jahnke1, Vesna Furundzija, Rolf Gebker, Robert Manka, Michael Frick, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Nikolaus Marx, Ingo Paetsch.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the gender related long-term prognostic value of adenosine perfusion and dobutamine wall motion imaging as assessed during a combined single-session stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination. In 717 patients a combined CMR stress examination was performed. Inducible perfusion deficits and wall motion abnormalities were identified visually. Clinical parameters were assessed at the time of the CMR examination. All patients were contacted to determine the occurrence of hard cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction) during a median follow-up period of 5.3 years. A complete combined CMR examination and follow-up data were available in 679 patients (471 men). A total of 77 hard cardiac events (63 in men) occurred during follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed the presence of inducible perfusion deficits or wall motion abnormalities as independent predictors of hard cardiac events for both gender with an incremental value over conventional cardiovascular risk factors. In case of a negative stress test result, event-free survival was 100% in women for 4 years and >99% in men for 2 years after the CMR examination. CMR perfusion and wall motion testing are equally suited for cardiac risk stratification in men and women. Stress CMR negative women exhibited very low event rates up to 4 years following the examination, while in men annual event rates increased after the second year. Consequently, the generally proposed 2-year warranty period of non-invasive stress testing may be prolonged to a 4 year level in CMR stress testing negative women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21732028     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9919-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  22 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Incremental prognostic significance of combined cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, adenosine stress perfusion, delayed enhancement, and left ventricular function over preimaging information for the prediction of adverse events.

Authors:  Scott E Bingham; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Breast attenuation artifacts in Tl-201 scintigraphy.

Authors:  E H Botvinick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The noninvasive prediction of cardiac mortality in men and women with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Study Group.

Authors:  T H Marwick; L J Shaw; M S Lauer; K Kesler; R Hachamovitch; G V Heller; M I Travin; S Borges-Neto; D S Berman; D D Miller
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jennifer H Mieres; Leslee J Shaw; Andrew Arai; Matthew J Budoff; Scott D Flamm; W Gregory Hundley; Thomas H Marwick; Lori Mosca; Ayan R Patel; Miguel A Quinones; Rita F Redberg; Kathryn A Taubert; Allen J Taylor; Gregory S Thomas; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging.

Authors:  Cosima Jahnke; Eike Nagel; Rolf Gebker; Thomas Kokocinski; Sebastian Kelle; Robert Manka; Eckart Fleck; Ingo Paetsch
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Seven-year follow-up after dobutamine stress echocardiography: impact of gender on prognosis.

Authors:  Elena Biagini; Abdou Elhendy; Jeroen J Bax; Vittoria Rizzello; Arend F L Schinkel; Ron T van Domburg; Miklos D Kertai; Boudewijn J Krenning; Manolis Bountioukos; Claudio Rapezzi; Angelo Branzi; Maarten L Simoons; Don Poldermans
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Gender differences in use of stress testing and coronary heart disease mortality: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  V L Roger; S J Jacobsen; P A Pellikka; T D Miller; K R Bailey; B J Gersh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Women with chest pain: is exercise testing worthwhile?

Authors:  N Curzen; D Patel; D Clarke; C Wright; D Mulcahy; A Sullivan; D Holdright; K Fox
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  9 in total

1.  Detection of coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women: the significance of integrated stress imaging tests in a 4-year prognostic study.

Authors:  Michael Becker; Anne Hundemer; Christian Zwicker; Ertunc Altiok; Thomas Krohn; Felix M Mottaghy; Christina Lente; Malte Kelm; Nikolaus Marx; Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Long-term prognostic performance of low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering.

Authors:  Olivier F Clerc; Basil P Kaufmann; Mathias Possner; Riccardo Liga; Jan Vontobel; Fran Mikulicic; Christoph Gräni; Dominik C Benz; Tobias A Fuchs; Julia Stehli; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Cardiac MRI and Ischemic Heart Disease: Role in Diagnosis and Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Rahul N Sawlani; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 5.  Utility of Imaging in Risk Stratification of Chest Pain in Women.

Authors:  Emily S Lau; Amy Sarma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christina Doesch; Theano Papavassiliu
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-26

7.  Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Courtney M McVey; Jeffrey S Berger; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Noninvasive Evaluation of Symptomatic Women with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Mohammed A Chamsi-Pasha; Karla M Kurrelmeyer
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 9.  Cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiography for clinical imaging of stable coronary artery disease. Diagnostic classification and risk stratification.

Authors:  Grigorios Korosoglou; Sorin Giusca; Gitsios Gitsioudis; Christian Erbel; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.