Literature DB >> 9855031

Conceptual and statistical issues in the validation of analytic dilution assays for pharmaceutical applications.

W C Smith1, G S Sittampalam.   

Abstract

The discovery, research, and development of a pharmaceutical product relies on the availability of validated assays for assessing product characteristics and drug effects in vivo and in vitro. Development of a validated assay is a multifaceted activity that provides many interesting challenges for bioanalytical chemists and statisticians. In this paper, the similarity condition for fundamental validity of an analytic dilution assay is reviewed as a basic concept underlying the validation of assays for pharmaceutical applications. The distinction between the validity and the acceptability of an assay is considered in terms of the characteristics evaluated during four stages of validation. Recent guidelines on the validation of analytical procedures published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are appraised from a statistical perspective, and statistical issues in the validation process are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9855031     DOI: 10.1080/10543409808835257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  5 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory methods for allergen extract analysis and quality control.

Authors:  T J Grier
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.667

2.  Appropriate calibration curve fitting in ligand binding assays.

Authors:  John W A Findlay; Robert F Dillard
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development: a conference report.

Authors:  Jean W Lee; Russ S Weiner; Jeff M Sailstad; Ronald R Bowsher; Dean W Knuth; Peter J O'Brien; Jean L Fourcroy; Rakesh Dixit; Lini Pandite; Robert G Pietrusko; Holly D Soares; Valerie Quarmby; Ole L Vesterqvist; David M Potter; James L Witliff; Herbert A Fritche; Timothy O'Leary; Lorah Perlee; Sunil Kadam; John A Wagner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Quantitative anti-PA IgG ELISA; assessment and comparability with the anthrax toxin neutralization assay in goats.

Authors:  Okechukwu C Ndumnego; Jannie Crafford; Wolfgang Beyer; Henriette van Heerden
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.741

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.