Literature DB >> 9851345

Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles.

R E Sutter1, P K Turley.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that esthetic Caucasian profiles exhibit fuller lips than the norm for their race, while esthetic African American profiles are similar to those of esthetic Caucasians. The present study was undertaken to compare the profiles of female Caucasian and African American models and their nonmodel counterparts. Four groups of 30 subjects were evaluated: Caucasian models [CM], Caucasian controls [CC], African American models [AM], and African American controls [AC]. The models' profiles were photographed from current fashion magazines, the photos were scanned, and 17 landmarks were digitized. Each profile was standardized for size and oriented along the N'-Sn' line on a Macintosh 6115CD computer. Control photographs were processed in a similar manner. Twenty-six variables were measured for each profile. Means, ranges, and standard deviations were computed along with unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-tests (p<0.05) to evaluate group differences. The results showed that for the AM and AC profiles, all but two of the 26 variable were similar. For the CM and CC profiles, eight variables demonstrated significant differences. Between-race comparisons demonstrated greater numbers of parameters that were significantly different: CM/AM with 18 and CM/AC, CC/AC, and CC/AM with 22 each. Most of the differences involved the lips. Vertical soft tissue proportions for the four groups did not follow a 40/20/40 ratio. Caucasian and African American models displayed significantly different profile characteristics. The African American models and controls showed similar profile features, whereas greater differences were observed between Caucasian models and controls. Based on our study, the African American profile currently presented in the mass media is not "Caucasian-like." In fact, it appears that Caucasian models display more ethnic features than African American models do Caucasian features, suggesting that previously held concepts of facial beauty may no longer apply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9851345     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0487:STEOCC>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  10 in total

1.  Limitations of traditional morphometrics in research on the attractiveness of faces.

Authors:  Erik Holland
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

2.  Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria.

Authors:  Andréa Reis de Melo; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Renata Rodrigues Almeida-Pedrin; Victor Didier; Danilo Pinelli Valarelli; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017-02

3.  Response to comments regarding the interlabial angle.

Authors:  Yasas S N Jayaratne; Curtis K Deutsch; Roger A Zwahlen
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Addressing racial inequalities in dental education: decolonising the dental curricula.

Authors:  Kamran Ali; Ewen McColl; Christopher Tredwin; Sally Hanks; Catherine Coelho; Robert Witton
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.

Authors:  Helena Nunes da Rocha Fortes; Thamirys Correia Guimarães; Ivana Mara Lira Belo; Edgard Norões Rodrigues da Matta
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

6.  Evaluation of the facial dimensions of young adult women with a preferred facial appearance.

Authors:  Sae Yong Kim; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Yoon-Ah Kook; Ju Hee Kang; Kang Hyuk Kim; Hong-Beom Moon
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Disparity in opinions on lip protrusiveness in contemporary African American faces.

Authors:  Yvette Battle; Monica Schneider; Laurence Magder; Eung-Kwon Pae
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  A three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis of the facial esthetics of the Miss Korea pageant contestants.

Authors:  Kab Soo Jang; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Ki-Ho Park; Hong-Beom Moon; Yoon-Ah Kook
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Influence of Age on Perception of Best Esthetical Profile.

Authors:  Parisa Salehi; Niloofar Azadeh; Negin Beigi; Mitra Farzin
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2019-03

10.  Ideal Soft Tissue Facial Profile in Iranian Males and Females: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Amir Ali Mafi; Reza Shahverdiani; Parviz Mafi
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.