Literature DB >> 24363489

Practical Methods for Bounding Type I Error Rate with an Internal Pilot Design.

Christopher S Coffey1, John A Kairalla2, Keith E Muller3.   

Abstract

New analytic forms for distributions at the heart of internal pilot theory solve many problems inherent to current techniques for linear models with Gaussian errors. Internal pilot designs use a fraction of the data to re-estimate the error variance and modify the final sample size. Too small or too large a sample size caused by an incorrect planning variance can be avoided. However, the usual hypothesis test may need adjustment to control the Type I error rate. A bounding test achieves control of Type I error rate while providing most of the advantages of the unadjusted test. Unfortunately, the presence of both a doubly truncated and an untruncated chi-square random variable complicates the theory and computations. An expression for the density of the sum of the two chi-squares gives a simple form for the test statistic density. Examples illustrate that the new results make the bounding test practical by providing very stable, convergent, and much more accurate computations. Furthermore, the new computational methods are effectively never slower and usually much faster. All results apply to any univariate linear model with fixed predictors and Gaussian errors, with the t-test a special case.

Keywords:  Adaptive designs; Power; Sample size re-estimation

Year:  2007        PMID: 24363489      PMCID: PMC3867302          DOI: 10.1080/03610920601143634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods        ISSN: 0361-0926            Impact factor:   0.893


  16 in total

1.  An improved double sampling procedure based on the variance.

Authors:  M A Proschan; J Wittes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Re-calculating the sample size in internal pilot study designs with control of the type I error rate.

Authors:  M Kieser; T Friede
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Internal pilot studies II: comparison of various procedures.

Authors:  D M Zucker; J T Wittes; O Schabenberger; E Brittain
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Controlling test size while gaining the benefits of an internal pilot design.

Authors:  C S Coffey; K E Muller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Properties of internal pilots with the univariate approach to repeated measures.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.

Authors:  Frank Miller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Sample size recalculation in internal pilot study designs: a review.

Authors:  Tim Friede; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

8.  Some Distributions and Their Implications for an Internal Pilot Study With a Univariate Linear Model.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 0.893

9.  Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.

Authors:  E D Pisano; S Zong; B M Hemminger; M DeLuca; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; S M Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Adaptive grey level assignment in CT scan display.

Authors:  S M Pizer; J B Zimmerman; E V Staab
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  5 in total

1.  GLUMIP 2.0: SAS/IML Software for Planning Internal Pilots.

Authors:  John A Kairalla; Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 6.440

2.  Public health nursing case management for women receiving temporary assistance for needy families: a randomized controlled trial using community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Shawn M Kneipp; John A Kairalla; Barbara J Lutz; Deidre Pereira; Allyson G Hall; Joan Flocks; Linda Beeber; Todd Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Internal pilot design for balanced repeated measures.

Authors:  Xinrui Zhang; Keith E Muller; Maureen M Goodenow; Yueh-Yun Chi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  An internal pilot design for prospective cancer screening trials with unknown disease prevalence.

Authors:  John T Brinton; Brandy M Ringham; Deborah H Glueck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Adaptive trial designs: a review of barriers and opportunities.

Authors:  John A Kairalla; Christopher S Coffey; Mitchell A Thomann; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.