Literature DB >> 984803

Comparative toxicological studies of amphotericin B methyl ester and amphotericin B in mice, rats, and dogs.

G R Keim, P L Sibley, Y H Yoon, J S Kulesza, I H Zaidi, M M Miller, J W Poutsiaka.   

Abstract

In acute and subacute toxicological studies, amphotericin B methyl ester was shown to be much less toxic than the parent antibiotic. As a single intravenous dose in mice, the methyl ester was approximately 20 times less toxic than amphotericin B. Also, the acute toxicity of the methyl ester in mice was not enhanced by the presence of chemically induced hepatic or renal damage or by the concurrent administration of amphotericin B or flucytosine. In a 1-month intraperitoneal study in rats, the methyl ester was about one-fourth as nephrotoxic as amphotericin B. In a 1-month intravenous study in dogs, the methyl ester was about one-eighth as nephrotoxic and one-fourth to one-half as hepatotoxic as the parent compound. In addition, the methyl ester, unlike amphotericin B, produced minimal renal effects, which did not increase in severity with increasing dosage. Based on the results of these studies, it is concluded that amphotericin B methyl ester has the potential for an improved therapeutic ratio in the treatment of systemic mycoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 984803      PMCID: PMC429815          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.10.4.687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  8 in total

1.  Comparative in vitro antifungal activity of amphotericin B and amphotericin B methyl ester.

Authors:  W R Howarth; R P Tewari; M Solotorovsky
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Chemotherapy of systemic mycoses (first of two parts).

Authors:  J E Bennett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Polyene macrolide derivatives. I. N-acylation and esterification reactions with amphotericin B.

Authors:  W Mechlinski; C P Schaffner
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Stability studies with amphotericin B and amphotericin B methyl ester.

Authors:  D P Bonner; W Mechlinski; C P Schaffner
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Comparative chemotherapeutic activity of amphotericin B and amphotericine B methy ester.

Authors:  D P Bonner; R P Tewari; M Solotorovsky; W Mechlinski; C P Schaffner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Amphotericin B methyl ester hydrochloride and amphotericin B: comparative acute toxicity.

Authors:  G R Keim; J W Poutsiaka; J Kirpan; C H Keysser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Polyene macrolide derivatives. 3. Biological properties of polyene macrolide ester salts.

Authors:  D P Bonner; W Mechlinski; C P Schaffner
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Polyene macrolide derivatives. II. Physical-chemical properties of polyene macrolide esters and their water soluble salts.

Authors:  C P Schaffner; W Mechlinski
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 2.649

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Therapy of fungal infections.

Authors:  D J Drutz
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1982-11

2.  Ornithyl amphotericin methyl ester treatment of experimental candidiasis in rats.

Authors:  J N Galgiani; D B VanWyck
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative in vitro and in vivo evaluation of N-D-ornithyl amphotericin B methyl ester, amphotericin B methyl ester, and amphotericin B.

Authors:  R M Parmegiani; D Loebenberg; B Antonacci; T Yarosh-Tomaine; R Scupp; J J Wright; P J Chiu; G H Miller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative toxicities of amphotericin B and its monomethyl ester derivative on glial cells in culture.

Authors:  S P Racis; O J Plescia; H M Geller; C P Schaffner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparative in vitro susceptibility of yeasts to amphotericin B and three methyl ester derivatives.

Authors:  D L Oblack; W L Hewitt; W J Martin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparative susceptibility of four kinds of pathogenic fungi to amphotericin B and amphotericin B methyl ester.

Authors:  A C Huston; P D Hoeprich
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of amphotericin B and N-D-ornithyl amphotericin B methyl ester in experimental cryptococcal meningitis and Candida albicans endocarditis with pyelonephritis.

Authors:  J R Perfect; D T Durack
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative neurotoxicities of amphotericin B and its mono-methyl ester derivative in rats.

Authors:  K R Reuhl; M Vapiwala; M T Ryzlak; C P Schaffner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparative pharmacology of amphotericin B and amphotericin B methyl ester in the non-human primate, Macacca mulatta.

Authors:  F A Jagdis; P D Hoeprich; R M Lawrence; C P Schaffner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of nephrotoxicities of different polyoxyethyleneglycol formulations of amphotericin B in rats.

Authors:  C Tasset; V Preat; A Bernard; M Roland
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.