Literature DB >> 9845565

Impact of sedation and resident teaching on complications of colonoscopy.

S Galandiuk1, P Ahmad.   

Abstract

There is controversy regarding the frequency of sedation-related complications of colonoscopies and whether these procedures are safely performed by physicians-in-training. We retrospectively reviewed the safety of 1,004 consecutive outpatient colonoscopies. No perforations occurred. No patients were hospitalized for sedation-related complications. Seventeen percent of patients had significant changes in vital signs that lasted less than 5 min. These changes were less common in patients receiving </=3 mg midazolam intravenously without meperidine (p < 0.005). Complications were slightly more frequent in procedures performed by trainees (23%) than by gastroenterologists (12%) and by surgeons (18%) (p = 0.01). These data support the safety of colonoscopy under intravenous sedation, even when performed by trainees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9845565     DOI: 10.1159/000018588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  7 in total

1.  Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; G M Eisen; C Simmang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The in-patient colonoscopy: a difficult endeavor.

Authors:  Robert Enns; Darin Krygier
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Granting of privilege for gastrointestinal endoscopy : This privilege guideline was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  Yumi Hori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Design and validation of a cost-effective physical endoscopic simulator for fundamentals of endoscopic surgery training.

Authors:  Neil King; Anastasia Kunac; Erik Johnsen; Gregory Gallina; Aziz M Merchant
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines.

Authors:  S D Wexner; J E Garbus; J J Singh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  What are the risk factors of colonoscopic perforation?

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Sasithorn Sujarittanakarn; Thawatchai Akaraviputh; Narong Lertakyamanee; Darin Lohsiriwat; Udom Kachinthorn
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The Impact of Hospital Teaching Status on Colonoscopy Perforation Risk: A National Inpatient Sample Study.

Authors:  Mowyad Khalid; Mazin Khalid; Vijay Gayam; Ahmed Yeddi; Omeralfaroug Adam; Sandipan Chakraborty; Mohamed Abdallah; Ahmad Abu-Heija; Zaid Kaloti; Osama Mukhtar; Hammam Shereef; Stephanie Judd
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2020-02-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.