Neil King1, Anastasia Kunac2, Erik Johnsen3, Gregory Gallina4, Aziz M Merchant5,6. 1. Division of General Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. 2. Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, 185 So. Orange Ave., MSB G-506, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. 4. Division of Surgery, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA. 5. Division of General Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. Aziz.Merchant@rutgers.edu. 6. Department of Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, 185 So. Orange Ave., MSB G-506, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. Aziz.Merchant@rutgers.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The American Board of Surgery will require graduating surgical residents to achieve proficiency in endoscopy. Surgical simulation can help residents to prepare for this proficiency test, accelerate skill acquisition, shorten the learning, and improve patient safety. Currently, endoscopic simulators are extremely cost-prohibitive. We therefore designed an inexpensive physical endoscopic simulator to (1) facilitate Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery skills training and (2) teach basic colonoscopy skills, for <$200.00. METHODS: We constructed the Rutgers Open Source Colonoscopy Simulator (ROSCO) from easily acquired commercial materials. For construct validation, we compared novices to experts in a two-arm non-randomized study. Each participant performed the five tasks and a full cecal intubation on the simulator. Face and content validity surveys were taken by the experts, after the construct validity study to determine the simulator's ability to achieve the intended task with "realism." Data were collected on (1) cost and construction, (2) time to completion of individual tasks, (3) percentage of task completion, and (4) survey statistics. RESULTS: Our simulator requires no advanced expertise, costs $62.77 US, and weighs 8.5 pounds. The ROSCO simulator was clearly able to distinguish expert from novice. Expert task times for completing all five tasks, performing the loop reduction, and reaching the splenic and hepatic flexures on the simulator were significantly better than novice times (p < 0.05). All participants were able to complete all five tasks on the simulator 100 % of the time. Three out of five experts "Agreed" or "Strongly Agreed" with five out of the six statements regarding the simulator's teaching ability. Four out of five experts rated each of the five specific aspects of the simulator as "Realistic" or "Very Realistic." CONCLUSIONS: We have designed a low-cost colonoscopy simulator with easily available materials and which requires very little advanced construction expertise and have demonstrated construct, face, and content validity. We believe this will have broad impact for endoscopic simulation, surgical education, and health education cost.
BACKGROUND: The American Board of Surgery will require graduating surgical residents to achieve proficiency in endoscopy. Surgical simulation can help residents to prepare for this proficiency test, accelerate skill acquisition, shorten the learning, and improve patient safety. Currently, endoscopic simulators are extremely cost-prohibitive. We therefore designed an inexpensive physical endoscopic simulator to (1) facilitate Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery skills training and (2) teach basic colonoscopy skills, for <$200.00. METHODS: We constructed the Rutgers Open Source Colonoscopy Simulator (ROSCO) from easily acquired commercial materials. For construct validation, we compared novices to experts in a two-arm non-randomized study. Each participant performed the five tasks and a full cecal intubation on the simulator. Face and content validity surveys were taken by the experts, after the construct validity study to determine the simulator's ability to achieve the intended task with "realism." Data were collected on (1) cost and construction, (2) time to completion of individual tasks, (3) percentage of task completion, and (4) survey statistics. RESULTS: Our simulator requires no advanced expertise, costs $62.77 US, and weighs 8.5 pounds. The ROSCO simulator was clearly able to distinguish expert from novice. Expert task times for completing all five tasks, performing the loop reduction, and reaching the splenic and hepatic flexures on the simulator were significantly better than novice times (p < 0.05). All participants were able to complete all five tasks on the simulator 100 % of the time. Three out of five experts "Agreed" or "Strongly Agreed" with five out of the six statements regarding the simulator's teaching ability. Four out of five experts rated each of the five specific aspects of the simulator as "Realistic" or "Very Realistic." CONCLUSIONS: We have designed a low-cost colonoscopy simulator with easily available materials and which requires very little advanced construction expertise and have demonstrated construct, face, and content validity. We believe this will have broad impact for endoscopic simulation, surgical education, and health education cost.
Authors: Jennifer King; Erin P Fraher; Thomas C Ricketts; Anthony Charles; George F Sheldon; Anthony A Meyer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Melina C Vassiliou; Pepa A Kaneva; Benjamin K Poulose; Brian J Dunkin; Jeffrey M Marks; Riadh Sadik; Gideon Sroka; Mehran Anvari; Klaus Thaler; Gina L Adrales; Jeffrey W Hazey; Jenifer R Lightdale; Vic Velanovich; Lee L Swanstrom; John D Mellinger; Gerald M Fried Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: J Ansell; K Arnaoutakis; S Goddard; N Hawkes; R Leicester; S Dolwani; J Torkington; N Warren Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Adam V Haycock; Philippa Youd; Paul Bassett; Brian P Saunders; Paris Tekkis; Siwan Thomas-Gibson Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Arjun D Koch; Sonja N Buzink; Jeroen Heemskerk; Sanne M B I Botden; Roeland Veenendaal; Jack J Jakimowicz; Erik J Schoon Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-05-22 Impact factor: 4.584