Literature DB >> 9845030

Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids.

B C Moore1, B R Glasberg.   

Abstract

A model for predicting loudness for people with cochlear hearing loss is applied to the problem of prescribing the frequency-gain characteristic of a linear hearing aid. It is argued that a reasonable goal is to make all frequency bands of speech equally loud while achieving a comfortable overall loudness; this can maximize the proportion of the speech spectrum that is above the absolute threshold for a given loudness. In terms of the model this means that the specific loudness pattern evoked by speech of a moderate level (65 dB SPL) should be reasonably flat (equal loudness per critical band), and the overall loudness should be similar to that evoked in a normal listener by 65 dB speech (about 23 sones). The model is used to develop a new formula - the 'Cambridge formula' - for prescribing insertion gain from audiometric thresholds. It is shown that, for a fixed overall loudness of 23 sones, the Cambridge formula leads to a higher calculated articulation index than three other commonly used prescriptive methods: NAL(R), FIG6 and DSL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9845030     DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  19 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

3.  Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The effect of speech material on the band importance function for Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Yufan Du; Yi Shen; Xihong Wu; Jing Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Influence of suppression on restoration of spectral loudness summation in listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Robin R High; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-03

8.  Comparing In-ear EOG for Eye-Movement Estimation With Eye-Tracking: Accuracy, Calibration, and Speech Comprehension.

Authors:  Martin A Skoglund; Martin Andersen; Martha M Shiell; Gitte Keidser; Mike Lind Rank; Sergi Rotger-Griful
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.152

9.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

10.  Subjective ratings of masker disturbance during the perception of native and non-native speech.

Authors:  Lisa Kilman; Adriana A Zekveld; Mathias Hällgren; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.