Literature DB >> 9843957

Cleavage planes in frog eggs are altered by strong magnetic fields.

J M Denegre1, J M Valles, K Lin, W B Jordan, K L Mowry.   

Abstract

Early cleavages of Xenopus embryos were oriented in strong, static magnetic fields. Third-cleavage planes, normally horizontal, were seen to orient to a vertical plane parallel with a vertical magnetic field. Second cleavages, normally vertical, could also be oriented by applying a horizontal magnetic field. We argue that these changes in cleavage-furrow geometries result from changes in the orientation of the mitotic apparatus. We hypothesize that the magnetic field acts directly on the microtubules of the mitotic apparatus. Considerations of the length of the astral microtubules, their diamagnetic anisotropy, and flexural rigidity predict the required field strength for an effect that agrees with the data. This observation provides a clear example of a static magnetic-field effect on a fundamental cellular process, cell division.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9843957      PMCID: PMC24517          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  The susceptibility of pure tubulin to high magnetic fields: a magnetic birefringence and x-ray fiber diffraction study.

Authors:  W Bras; G P Diakun; J F Díaz; G Maret; H Kramer; J Bordas; F J Medrano
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of microtubules, microtubule-associated proteins, and microtubule-organizing centers during amphibian oogenesis and early development.

Authors:  D L Gard; B J Cha; M M Schroeder
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Localized maternal proteins in Xenopus revealed by subtractive immunization.

Authors:  J M Denegre; E R Ludwig; K L Mowry
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Measurement of the force-velocity relation for growing microtubules.

Authors:  M Dogterom; B Yurke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Assembly and positioning of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers.

Authors:  T E Holy; M Dogterom; B Yurke; S Leibler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The first cleavage plane and the embryonic axis are determined by separate mechanisms in Xenopus laevis. I. Independence in undisturbed embryos.

Authors:  M V Danilchik; S D Black
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Physical theory of the orientation of astral mitotic spindles.

Authors:  M Bjerknes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Magnetic anisotropy and the orientation of retinal rods in a homogeneous magnetic field.

Authors:  F T Hong; D Mauzerall; A Mauro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Establishment of the mechanism of cytokinesis in animal cells.

Authors:  R Rappaport
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1986

10.  Oriented fibrin gels formed by polymerization in strong magnetic fields.

Authors:  J Torbet; J M Freyssinet; G Hudry-Clergeon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  21 in total

1.  A small, physiological electric field orients cell division.

Authors:  M Zhao; J V Forrester; C D McCaig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Model of magnetic field-induced mitotic apparatus reorientation in frog eggs.

Authors:  James M Valles
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Eukaryotic cells and their cell bodies: Cell Theory revised.

Authors:  Frantisek Baluska; Dieter Volkmann; Peter W Barlow
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Diamagnetic levitation enhances growth of liquid bacterial cultures by increasing oxygen availability.

Authors:  Camelia E Dijkstra; Oliver J Larkin; Paul Anthony; Michael R Davey; Laurence Eaves; Catherine E D Rees; Richard J A Hill
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Safety concerns related to magnetic field exposure.

Authors:  Amanda K Andriola Silva; Erica L Silva; E Sócrates T Egito; Artur S Carriço
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.

Authors:  Shannon Tocchio; Beth Kline-Fath; Emanuel Kanal; Vincent J Schmithorst; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 7.  Macrophage phenotype bioengineered by magnetic, genetic, or pharmacologic interference.

Authors:  Jarek Wosik; Martha Suarez-Villagran; John H Miller; Rafik M Ghobrial; Malgorzata Kloc
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 8.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 tesla (preliminary experience).

Authors:  Teresa Victoria; Diego Jaramillo; Timothy Paul Leslie Roberts; Deborah Zarnow; Ann Michelle Johnson; Jorge Delgado; Erika Rubesova; Arastoo Vossough
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-03-27

9.  Exposure of postnatal rats to a static magnetic field of 0.14 T influences functional laterality of the hippocampal high-affinity choline uptake system in adulthood; in vitro test with magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Z Kristofiková; M Cermák; O Benesová; J Klaschka; P Zach
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 10.  Toward 20 T magnetic resonance for human brain studies: opportunities for discovery and neuroscience rationale.

Authors:  Thomas F Budinger; Mark D Bird; Lucio Frydman; Joanna R Long; Thomas H Mareci; William D Rooney; Bruce Rosen; John F Schenck; Victor D Schepkin; A Dean Sherry; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles S Springer; Keith R Thulborn; Kamil Uğurbil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.