Literature DB >> 9842815

The feasibility of intracarotid adenosine for the manipulation of human cerebrovascular resistance.

S Joshi1, W L Young, J Pile-Spellman, D H Duong, M C Vang, L Hacein-Bey, H T Lee, N Ostapkovich.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To assess the feasibility of manipulating human cerebrovascular resistance with adenosine, we measured cerebral blood flow (CBF) by determining the initial slope (IS) of tracer washout 20-80 s after intracarotid 133Xe injection (standard IS) during sequential 3-min intracarotid infusions of (a) saline; (b) adenosine 1.2-mg bolus followed by an infusion of 1 mg/min (bolus + infusion); (c) saline; and (d) nicardipine (0.1 mg/min). During 133Xe washout, adenosine caused a rapidly clearing compartment. Therefore, tracer washout was also analyzed 5-25 s after injection (early IS). Nicardipine (n = 8) increased both standard IS (from 39+/-12 to 53+/-16 mL 100g.min(-1); P < 0.005) and early IS (from 40+/-9 to 55+/-20 arbitrary units; P < 0.02) to a similar degree. Adenosine bolus + infusion increased early IS (from 33+/-6 to 82+/-43 arbitrary units; P < 0.02) but did not increase standard IS (from 41+/-12 to 43 +/-16 mL 100g(-1) min(-1)). Standard and early IS values were then determined before and after adenosine delivered either by infusion alone (2 mg/min for 3 min, n = 5) or bolus alone (2 mg in 1 s, n = 3). Neither standard nor early IS changed after adenosine infusion alone. Early IS increased after adenosine bolus alone. Increase in early IS, but not standard IS, suggests a transient (<30 s) increase in CBF. IMPLICATIONS: Intracarotid adenosine, in the 1- to 2-mg dose range, may cause a transient, but not a sustained, increase in cerebral blood flow. Intracarotid adenosine in such a dose range does not seem to be an appropriate drug for sustained manipulation of cerebrovascular resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9842815     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199812000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the brain: rationalizing the novel methods of drug delivery to the central nervous system.

Authors:  Shailendra Joshi; Eugene Ornstein; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Computational pharmacokinetic rationale for intra-arterial delivery to the brain.

Authors:  Johann N R Cooke; Jason A Ellis; Shaolie Hossain; Juliane Nguyen; Jeffrey N Bruce; Shailendra Joshi
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  Revisiting intra-arterial drug delivery for treating brain diseases or is it "déjà-vu, all over again"?

Authors:  Shailendra Joshi; Jason A Ellis; Charles W Emala
Journal:  J Neuroanaesth Crit Care       Date:  2014-05

4.  Increased tissue perfusion promotes capillary dysplasia in the ALK1-deficient mouse brain following VEGF stimulation.

Authors:  Qi Hao; Hua Su; Douglas A Marchuk; Radoslaw Rola; Yongqiang Wang; Weizhong Liu; William L Young; Guo-Yuan Yang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 5.  Intracarotid delivery of drugs: the potential and the pitfalls.

Authors:  Shailendra Joshi; Phillip M Meyers; Eugene Ornstein
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  Improving Reperfusion Therapies in the Era of Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Italo Linfante; Marilyn J Cipolla
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.829

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.