Literature DB >> 9841678

Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: A reappraisal of evolutionary relationships among archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes.

R S Gupta1.   

Abstract

The presence of shared conserved insertion or deletions (indels) in protein sequences is a special type of signature sequence that shows considerable promise for phylogenetic inference. An alternative model of microbial evolution based on the use of indels of conserved proteins and the morphological features of prokaryotic organisms is proposed. In this model, extant archaebacteria and gram-positive bacteria, which have a simple, single-layered cell wall structure, are termed monoderm prokaryotes. They are believed to be descended from the most primitive organisms. Evidence from indels supports the view that the archaebacteria probably evolved from gram-positive bacteria, and I suggest that this evolution occurred in response to antibiotic selection pressures. Evidence is presented that diderm prokaryotes (i.e., gram-negative bacteria), which have a bilayered cell wall, are derived from monoderm prokaryotes. Signature sequences in different proteins provide a means to define a number of different taxa within prokaryotes (namely, low G+C and high G+C gram-positive, Deinococcus-Thermus, cyanobacteria, chlamydia-cytophaga related, and two different groups of Proteobacteria) and to indicate how they evolved from a common ancestor. Based on phylogenetic information from indels in different protein sequences, it is hypothesized that all eukaryotes, including amitochondriate and aplastidic organisms, received major gene contributions from both an archaebacterium and a gram-negative eubacterium. In this model, the ancestral eukaryotic cell is a chimera that resulted from a unique fusion event between the two separate groups of prokaryotes followed by integration of their genomes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9841678      PMCID: PMC98952          DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.62.4.1435-1491.1998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev        ISSN: 1092-2172            Impact factor:   11.056


  213 in total

Review 1.  Earth's early atmosphere.

Authors:  J F Kasting
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The origin of the eukaryotic cell.

Authors:  H Hartman
Journal:  Speculations Sci Technol       Date:  1984

3.  An ATPase domain common to prokaryotic cell cycle proteins, sugar kinases, actin, and hsp70 heat shock proteins.

Authors:  P Bork; C Sander; A Valencia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The nature of the last universal ancestor and the root of the tree of life, still open questions.

Authors:  P Forterre; N Benachenhou-Lahfa; F Confalonieri; M Duguet; C Elie; B Labedan
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Biodiversity: molecular biological domains, symbiosis and kingdom origins.

Authors:  L Margulis
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  An estimate of the sequencing error frequency in the DNA sequence databases.

Authors:  T Kristensen; R Lopez; H Prydz
Journal:  DNA Seq       Date:  1992

7.  The concept of a bacterium.

Authors:  R Y STANIER; C B VAN NIEL
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1962

Review 8.  Origins of secondary metabolism.

Authors:  T Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1992

9.  Gene phylogenies and the endosymbiotic origin of plastids.

Authors:  C W Morden; C F Delwiche; M Kuhsel; J D Palmer
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 10.  Archaebacterial lipids: structure, biosynthesis and function.

Authors:  M Kates
Journal:  Biochem Soc Symp       Date:  1992
View more
  160 in total

1.  ICB database: the gyrB database for identification and classification of bacteria.

Authors:  K Watanabe; J Nelson; S Harayama; H Kasai
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The genomic tree as revealed from whole proteome comparisons.

Authors:  F Tekaia; A Lazcano; B Dujon
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  The origin of eukaryotes: the difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  T Vellai; G Vida
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A chimeric prokaryotic ancestry of mitochondria and primitive eukaryotes.

Authors:  S Karlin; L Brocchieri; J Mrázek; A M Campbell; A M Spormann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genome signature comparisons among prokaryote, plasmid, and mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  A Campbell; J Mrázek; S Karlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The chimeric eukaryote: origin of the nucleus from the karyomastigont in amitochondriate protists.

Authors:  L Margulis; M F Dolan; R Guerrero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Whole-genome trees based on the occurrence of folds and orthologs: implications for comparing genomes on different levels.

Authors:  J Lin; M Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  New insight into RNase P RNA structure from comparative analysis of the archaeal RNA.

Authors:  J K Harris; E S Haas; D Williams; D N Frank; J W Brown
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  The origin of the eukaryotic cell: a genomic investigation.

Authors:  Hyman Hartman; Alexei Fedorov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Spirochete and protist symbionts of a termite (Mastotermes electrodominicus) in Miocene amber.

Authors:  Andrew Wier; Michael Dolan; David Grimaldi; Ricardo Guerrero; Jorge Wagensberg; Lynn Margulis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.