Literature DB >> 9840635

Surface replacement hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

M W Hungerford1, M A Mont, R Scott, C Fiore, D S Hungerford, K A Krackow.   

Abstract

We reviewed the results of thirty-three femoral resurfacing procedures in twenty-five patients who had stage-III or early stage-IV osteonecrosis of the femoral head according to the classification system of Ficat and Arlet. There were no perioperative complications. Thirty hip prostheses (91 percent) survived for a minimum of five years. At a mean of 10.5 years (range, four to fourteen years) postoperatively, sixteen (62 percent) of the twenty-six hips with stage-III disease had a good or excellent Harris hip score. Four of the seven hips with stage-IV disease did not have or need a total hip arthroplasty. Overall, twenty hips (61 percent) had a good or excellent result according to the scoring system of Harris, and thirteen (39 percent) had a fair or poor result and subsequently had or needed a total hip arthroplasty. The mean interval between the hemiarthroplasty and the total hip arthroplasty was sixty months (range, thirty-six to 136 months). These thirteen hips all had a successful clinical result (a Harris hip score of at least 80 points) at a mean of thirty months (range, twenty-four to seventy-two months) after the total hip arthroplasty. The results of the present study suggest that resurfacing of the femoral head can be a successful interim procedure for the management of patients who have Ficat and Arlet stage-III or early stage-IV disease with a large lesion that is not amenable to other treatment options except total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9840635     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199811000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Surface replacement is comparable to primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mike S McGrath; David R Marker; Thorsten M Seyler; Slif D Ulrich; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Resurfacing hip prostheses revisited: failure analysis during a 16-year follow-up.

Authors:  A-W H B Duijsens; S Keizer; T Vliet-Vlieland; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Surgical treatment concepts for femoral head necrosis].

Authors:  D von Stechow; P Drees
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Femoral resurfacing in young patients with hematologic cancer and osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Evguenia J Karimova; Shesh N Rai; Jianrong Wu; Lunetha Britton; Sue C Kaste; Michael D Neel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-02-01

Review 6.  [Resurfacing for osteonecrosis of the femoral head].

Authors:  M Akbar; M A Mont; C Heisel; D R Marker; S D Ulrich; T M Seyler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis in the United States: 16-year analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Michael A Mont; Audrey K Tsao; Lynne C Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.