Literature DB >> 15856230

Resurfacing hip prostheses revisited: failure analysis during a 16-year follow-up.

A-W H B Duijsens1, S Keizer, T Vliet-Vlieland, R G H H Nelissen.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective study of the clinical and radiographic variables related to the survival of 114 cementless resurfacing double-cup hip replacements (RHR) with a mean follow-up of 9 (range: 1--16) years. Three patients died, and 22 were unavailable for the final review in 2003. Sixty-one RHRs had to be revised to a total hip replacement. Failure analysis of these revised RHRs showed femoral head and neck resorption under the prosthesis in 33, acetabular protrusion in seven, both femoral and acetabular resorption in 14 and a femoral-neck fracture in three. One hip had dislocated, and there were three hips with unexplained pain. The Kaplan-Meier 5-year mean survival was 92%, the 10-year survival was 47% (95% CI 37--57%) and the 15-year survival was 30% (95% CI 20--40%). Pre-operative joint destruction (grade 1), a high degree of radiological osteoporosis, a body mass index >25 and prosthesis mismatch were significantly related to failure of the RHR. We believe that in young, non-obese patients with pre-operative radiological central destruction but without severe proximal femoral osteoporosis, a resurfacing arthroplasty may have some value. Our failures were mainly due to femoral resorption under the prosthetic femoral component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15856230      PMCID: PMC3474522          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0652-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  16 in total

1.  Outcomes of limited femoral resurfacing arthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  M A Mont; A D Rajadhyaksha; D S Hungerford
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  ICLH double-cup arthroplasty, 1980-1987.

Authors:  L Cotella; G T Railton; D Nunn; M A Freeman; P A Revell
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films.

Authors:  A Larsen; K Dale; M Eek
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1977-07

4.  Duration of symptoms and outcome of hemiresurfacing for hip osteonecrosis.

Authors:  P E Beaulé; T P Schmalzried; P Campbell; F Dorey; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head. Early diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  R P Ficat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-01

6.  Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years.

Authors:  D W Howie; D Campbell; M McGee; B L Cornish
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The role of implant alignment on stability and particles on periprosthetic osteolysis--A rabbit model of implant failure.

Authors:  V L Fornasier; S B Goodman; K Protzner; M Kamel; Y Song; A Shojaci
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 8.  Osteonecrosis of the hip: management in the 21st century.

Authors:  Jay R Lieberman; Daniel J Berry; Michael A Mont; Roy K Aaron; John J Callaghan; Amar D Rajadhyaksha; James R Urbaniak
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2003

9.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Paul E Beaulé; Frederick J Dorey; Michel J Le Duff; Pat A Campbell; Thomas A Gruen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Daniel; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases.

Authors:  F Falez; F Favetti; F Casella; G Panegrossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Biomechanical aspects of the implant fixation and kinematics of hip resurfacing systems].

Authors:  R Bader; D Klüss; L Gerdesmeyer; E Steinhauser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Karen Pykerman; Jason Werle; Diane Lorenzetti; Tracy Wasylak; Tom Noseworthy; Donald A Dick; Greg O'Connor; Aish Sundaram; Sanne Heintzbergen; Cy Frank
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  No improvement in long-term wear and revision rates with the second-generation Biomet cup (RingLoc) in young patients: 141 hips followed for median 12 years.

Authors:  Bart Boesenach; Huub J L van der Heide; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith Tucker; Klaus-Peter Günther; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Jörg Lützner; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Rob G H H Nelissen; Toni Lange; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

6.  5-year clinical and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) follow-up of 39 CUT femoral neck total hip prostheses in young osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  The effects of necrotic lesion size and orientation of the femoral component on stress alterations in the proximal femur in hip resurfacing - a finite element simulation.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Tai; Yung-Chou Chen; Pang-Hsin Hsieh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.